Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36593668›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2023

Endoscopic endonasal resection of craniovertebral junction osteomyelitis: illustrative cases.

Alexander Keister, Joshua Vignolles-Jeong, Daniel Kreatsoulas, Kyle VanKoevering, Stephanus Viljoen, Daniel Prevedello, Andrew J Grossbach

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander Keister1The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; and.
Joshua Vignolles-Jeong1The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; and.
Daniel KreatsoulasDepartments of2Neurological Surgery and.
Kyle VanKoevering3Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.
Stephanus ViljoenDepartments of2Neurological Surgery and.
Daniel PrevedelloDepartments of2Neurological Surgery and.
Andrew J GrossbachDepartments of2Neurological Surgery and.
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOperative management of craniovertebral junction (CVJ) osteomyelitis has traditionally been extracranial and focused on debriding the infection. In select patients, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) with a focus on additional resection versus debridement may be preferred. The goal of this study is to present the authors' experience with the EEA with gross or subtotal resection for the treatment of osteomyelitis at the CVJ and describe their technique in the context of the literature. OBSERVATIONS: Two patients of the authors' and 6 detailed case reports in the literature were identified with a mean age of 58.9 years. Most patients (n = 5; 62.5%) underwent skull base surgery and debridement (n = 5; 62.5%). Although more common, debridement was inferior to resection in terms of neurological improvement (66.7% vs. 100.0%) postoperatively. The majority (n = 7; 87.5%) of patients underwent occipitocervical fusion. LESSONS: Osteomyelitis is an exceedingly rare lesion of the CVJ. Despite the region's delicate biomechanical stability, resection of infected bone may be superior to debridement alone in terms of clinical outcome. Given how well established the safety of the EEA is to this region, further study of outcomes with resection is warranted.

Indexed as

craniovertebral junctionendoscopic endonasal approachosteomyelitis

Identifiers

PMID36593668
PMCPMC9811576
OpenAlexW4313453968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.