Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36593522›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2023

The impact of genotyping strategies and statistical models on accuracy of genomic prediction for survival in pigs.

Tianfei Liu, Bjarne Nielsen, Ole F Christensen, Mogens Sandø Lund, Guosheng Su

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Tianfei LiuInstitute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Bjarne NielsenCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830, Tjele, Denmark.
Ole F ChristensenCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830, Tjele, Denmark.
Mogens Sandø LundCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830, Tjele, Denmark.
Guosheng SuCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830, Tjele, Denmark. guosheng.su@qgg.au.dk.
Aarhus University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvival from birth to slaughter is an important economic trait in commercial pig productions. Increasing survival can improve both economic efficiency and animal welfare. The aim of this study is to explore the impact of genotyping strategies and statistical models on the accuracy of genomic prediction for survival in pigs during the total growing period from birth to slaughter. 

resultsWe simulated pig populations with different direct and maternal heritabilities and used a linear mixed model, a logit model, and a probit model to predict genomic breeding values of pig survival based on data of individual survival records with binary outcomes (0, 1). The results show that in the case of only alive animals having genotype data, unbiased genomic predictions can be achieved when using variances estimated from pedigree-based model. Models using genomic information achieved up to 59.2% higher accuracy of estimated breeding value compared to pedigree-based model, dependent on genotyping scenarios. The scenario of genotyping all individuals, both dead and alive individuals, obtained the highest accuracy. When an equal number of individuals (80%) were genotyped, random sample of individuals with genotypes achieved higher accuracy than only alive individuals with genotypes. The linear model, logit model and probit model achieved similar accuracy.

conclusionsOur conclusion is that genomic prediction of pig survival is feasible in the situation that only alive pigs have genotypes, but genomic information of dead individuals can increase accuracy of genomic prediction by 2.06% to 6.04%.

Indexed as

Genomic predictionGenotyping strategySimulationStatistical modelsSurvival

Identifiers

PMID36593522
PMCPMC9809124
OpenAlexW4313488122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.