Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36593447›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Where, why and who delivers our babies? Examining the perspectives of women on utilization of antenatal and delivery services in a developing country.

Edmund Ndudi Ossai, Irene Ifeyinwa Eze, Pearl Chizobam Eke, Cosmas Kenan Onah, Chibuike Agu, Lawrence Ulu Ogbonnaya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edmund Ndudi OssaiDepartment of Community Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Ebonyi State University Abakaliki, Abakaliki, Nigeria. ossai_2@yahoo.co.uk.
Irene Ifeyinwa EzeDepartment of Community Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Ebonyi State University Abakaliki, Abakaliki, Nigeria.
Pearl Chizobam EkeDepartment of Nursing Services, Alex-Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Abakaliki, Nigeria.
Cosmas Kenan OnahDepartment of Community Medicine, Alex-Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Abakaliki, Nigeria.
Chibuike AguDepartment of Community Medicine, Alex-Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Abakaliki, Nigeria.
Lawrence Ulu OgbonnayaDepartment of Community Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Ebonyi State University Abakaliki, Abakaliki, Nigeria.
Federal Teaching Hospital Abakaliki · NGEbonyi State University · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe differences in maternal mortality between developed and developing countries is due to differences in use of antenatal and delivery services. The study was designed to determine the views of women on utilization of antenatal and delivery services in urban and rural communities of Ebonyi state, Nigeria.

methodsCommunity based descriptive exploratory study design was employed. Qualitative data was collected through use of pre-tested focus group discussion (FGD) guide. Eight FGDs were conducted among women who were pregnant and others who have delivered babies one year prior to the study. Four FGDs each were conducted in urban and rural communities. QDA Miner Lite v2.0.6 was used in the analysis of the data.

resultsMost of the participants in urban and rural areas prefer the man and woman deciding on where to receive antenatal and deliver care. All the participants in urban and rural communities wish for the support of their husbands when pregnant. Perceived quality of care is the major reason the women choose a facility for antenatal and delivery services. Others reasons included cost of services and proximity to a facility. Participants in rural communities were of the opinion that traditional birth attendants deliver unique services including helping women to achieve conception. For participants in urban, traditional birth attendants are very friendly and perhaps on divine assignment. These reasons explain why women still patronize their services. The major criticism of services of traditional birth attendants is their inability to manage complications associated with pregnancy and delivery. The major reasons why women delivery at home included poverty and cultural beliefs.

conclusionsAll efforts should be made to reduce the huge maternal death burden in Nigeria. This may necessitate the involvement of men and by extension communities in antenatal and delivery matters. There is need to train health workers in orthodox health facilities on delivery of quality healthcare. Public enlightenment on importance of health facility delivery will be of essence. Encouraging women to deliver in health facilities should be prioritized. This may entail the provision of free or subsidized delivery services. The deficiencies of primary health centers especially in rural communities should be addressed.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesMidwiferyDelivery, ObstetricDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansInfantMalePatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPrenatal CareQualitative ResearchRural PopulationAntenatal careDeliveryNigeriaRural Ebonyi stateUrbanUtilization

Identifiers

PMID36593447
PMCPMC9806875
OpenAlexW4313477136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.