ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Novel Tape Suture Osteosynthesis for Hyperextension Injuries of the Subaxial Cervical Spine: A Biomechanical Study.
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimAnterior tension band injuries are usually the result of high impact hyperextension trauma. Current surgical treatment includes anterior cervical discectomy and fusion bearing the risk of soft tissue irritation, degeneration of adjacent cervical segments, implant failure or iatrogenic spondylodesis. This study examined the biomechanical properties of tape suture constructs reenforcing ligamental stability for the treatment of Association of Osteosynthesis (AO) type B3 injuries compared to anterior fusion. MATERIALS AND
methodsAfter creation of an AO type B3 injury in synthetic cervical segments (C5/6, Sawbone
resultsAnterior fusion displayed a mean range of extension, lateral bending, and rotation of 3.60° (SD 1.87°), 2.28° (SD 1.55°), and 2.81° (SD 0.78°), respectively. The tape suture showed a mean range of extension, lateral bending, and rotation of 4.24° (SD 0.81°) (p=0.146), 5.44° (SD 1.56°) (p=0.013), and 5.29° (SD 1.44°) (p<0.01), respectively. No specimen suffered from implant failure.
conclusionThe tape suture construct provides sufficient biomechanical stability for the treatment of AO type B3 injuries compared to anterior fusion. Regarding cervical extension, whose limitation is crucial for ligamental healing, the tape suture shows no significant inferiority. Yet, the tape suture approaches physiological mobility in the planes not affected by the injury. Consequently, the tape suture is a promising alternative preventing an iatrogenic spondylodesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.