Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36593040›Full record

ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Implementation of a Hybrid Care Model for Telemedicine-based Cancer Pain Management at the Cancer Center of Naples, Italy: A Cohort Study.

Marco Cascella, Daniela Schiavo, Mariacinzia Grizzuti, Maria Cristina Romano, Sergio Coluccia, Sabrina Bimonte, Arturo Cuomo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Transforming Chronic Pain Care Through Telemedicine: An Italian Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marco CascellaDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS, Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Daniela SchiavoDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS, Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Mariacinzia GrizzutiDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS, Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Maria Cristina RomanoDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS, Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Sergio ColucciaEpidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS, Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Sabrina BimonteDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS, Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy; s.bimonte@istitutotumori.na.it.
Arturo CuomoDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS, Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimTelemedicine, the remote delivery of healthcare services, represents a great opportunity for cancer pain management. A care model of telemedicine that combines remote visits and hospital access could be an effective and safe strategy for pain management of cancer patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsA retrospective study was conducted using the dataset of the telemedicine program at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Naples, Italy for assessing the efficacy of a telehealth-based model of care. Demographic, clinical, and process variables were investigated.

resultsA total of 226 cases and 489 visits were included in the analysis. The mean age of patients was 63.4 years (SD=12.4 years), and no sex differences were observed. Approximately 55% of patients were ECOG-PS ≤2 and 87% suffered from metastatic disease. More than half of the patients were treated with high doses of opioids. Each patient had a mean of 2 remote visits and half of the patients had more than 1 telehealth consultation. The dropout ratio was 5.3%. Most visits (n=472) were conducted on patients in the Campania Region, Italy. The maximum covered distance from the Cancer Center and the patients' location was 555.22 Km. A significant difference in the overall number of visits (p=0.006) and the number of pro-capita remote visits (p=0.010) was found, in favor of the group of patients treated before the end of the Covid-19 emergency in Italy, compared to those treated after the pandemic.

conclusionDespite various positive outcomes, the analysis highlights several weaknesses, such as the need to assist patients with advanced and non-advanced disease located outside the regional territory. Overall, the telehealth processes should be adapted to post-pandemic scenarios towards their implementation in routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsTelemedicineCohort StudiesHumansItalyMiddle AgedPain ManagementRetrospective StudiesCancer painpainpain managementtelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36593040
PMCPMC9843760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.