ArticlePhysiological research2022
Contralateral and Ipsilateral Arterial Vasculature of the Human Uterus: The Pilot Results of an Anatomical Study.
Article in Physiological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Reply to Dion et al. Comment on "Sun et al. First Experience with Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion in Human Uteri: Feasibility and Metabolic Characterization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Biologically-Based Notions About Uterine Bleeding During Myomectomy: Reasoning on Tradition and New Concepts.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Internal Iliac Artery Ligation in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Surgical Anatomy and Surgical Considerations.Clinics and practice · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arterial blood to the human uterus is provided by a pair of uterine arteries (UA) and supported by terminal branches of ovarian (OA) and vaginal arteries (VA). Literature reports the existence of ipsilateral and contralateral anastomoses between these arteries and the UA, but data on the prevalence of such anastomoses are discrepant. The aim of this trial is to study whether contralateral and ipsilateral anastomoses exist. We studied nine human uterine specimens, which were obtained from (i) human cadavers (n = 6), (ii) uterine transplant recipients (n = 2), and (iii) one altruistic uterine donor (n = 1). We injected India ink into the graft through the UA of each specimen (n = 8) or OA (n = 1). We semiquantitatively observed and evaluated the extent of the injection on horizontal, vertical, and transmural levels. The dye permeated beyond the midline in 9/9 (100 %) cases. Near-complete/complete permeation to the contralateral side was observed in 6/9 (66 %) cases. The dye permeated ipsilaterally throughout all uterine levels in 8/8 cases (100 %) of UA injection. The entire wall of the myometrium was permeated in 2/9 (22 %) cases. In 7/9 (78 %) cases, the wall of the myometrium was permeated less than halfway through. In conclusion, the preliminary results of this study prove the existence of ipsilateral and contralateral anastomoses. Complete transmural injection was observed in only 22 % of cases; however, this finding does not provide information about the functional capacity of these anastomoses. More data and studies are necessary to make definitive conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36592444PMC9854000W4313361698What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.