Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36592284›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2023

An iterative algorithm for computing gradient directions for white matter fascicles detection in brain MRI.

Ashishi Puri, Sanjeev Kumar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ashishi Puri *Department of Mathematics, IIT Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, 247667, India.
Sanjeev Kumar *Department of Mathematics, IIT Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, 247667, India. sanjeev.kumar@ma.iitr.ac.in.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee · IN

Funding

Ministry of Human Resource Development India MHR01-23-200-4028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper proposes a new iterative algorithm for computing gradient directions (GD) to reconstruct the brain's white matter fascicles. In particular, the proposed algorithm extensively overcomes the limitations of existing approaches like Uniform Gradient Directions and Adaptive Gradient Directions (AGD) for this task. The proposed algorithm uses the AGD approach to have a coarse estimation of the fibers in the initial step, and then a refinement is done using an iterative strategy. We begin with GD distributed uniformly inside a grid of bigger size and larger spacing between the points. Both (grid size and spacing between the points) reduce iteratively. The proposed algorithm has higher chance of capturing the fibers' actual position within the grid at each iteration. Hence, the solution tends to the actual position of fiber in each iteration, leading to a better estimation of fiber orientations. Multiple artificial simulations and real dataset experiments on the human brain and optic chiasm of a rat's brain are performed. The excellent performance of the proposed algorithm at different noises ensures stability and robustness. Hence, after processing the MRI data, the proposed algorithm can accurately reflect the ground truth of white matter fascicles connections in reconstructed images. The proposed algorithm helps resolve the structural complexities of the brain caused due to presence of crossing fascicles to a great extent.

Indexed as

White MatterAlgorithmsBrainDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrainCrossing fibersDiffusion MRIMixture of Gaussian diffusionNon-central Wishart distributionWhite matter fascicles

Identifiers

PMID36592284
OpenAlexW4313424258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.