Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36592270›Full record

SynthesisHepatology international2023

High-potency nucleos(t)ide analogues alone or plus immunoglobulin for HBV prophylaxis after liver transplantation: a meta-analysis.

Li-Ping Sheng, Jun-Chang Zhang, Zhi-Qiang Zhong, Xue-Han Sheng, Jing Ren, Gui-Qiang Wang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hepatology international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Liver Transplantation for HBV-Related Disease in France: NUC Type Before LT Is Associated With Patient Survival.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Li-Ping Sheng *Department of Infectious Diseases and Center for Liver Diseases, Peking University International Hospital, Life Park Road No.1, Chang Ping District, Beijing, 102206, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5687-7333
Jun-Chang Zhang *Intensive Care Unit, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhi-Qiang Zhong *Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Xue-Han ShengThe First Clinical Medical College of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Jing RenDepartment of Infectious Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Gui-Qiang WangDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Center for Liver Diseases, Peking University International Hospital, Life Park Road No.1, Chang Ping District, Beijing, 102206, China. john131212@111.com.
Peking University · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CNHarbin Medical University · CNShanghai Changzheng Hospital · CNUniversity of Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimum prophylactic regimen against hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) in HBV-infected patients is uncertain but of great clinical relevance. New evidence suggests that hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG)-free approach would become a reasonable choice in the era of high-potency nucleos(t)ide analogues (HPNAs). We aimed to provide robust estimates for long-term survival and HBV recurrence in patients receiving different HBV-prophylaxis strategies after LT.

methodsWe did a systematic review and meta-analysis using both pseudo-individual patient data recovered from included studies (IPDMA) and conventional trial-level aggregate data meta-analysis (ADMA). Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using different Cox proportional hazard models accounting for inter-study heterogeneity. ADMA was conducted to pool outcomes at specific time points.

resultsA total of 16 studies involving 7897 patients and 41 studies involving 9435 were eligible for IPDMA and AMDA, respectively. Cumulative HBV recurrence rate and overall survival (OS) at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years post-LT were 0.3%, 0.9%, 1.2%, 1.7% and 95.6%, 89%, 86.4%, 86.4% in the HPNAs (i.e., entecavir and tenofovir) + HBIG combination group vs. 0.6%, 0.6%, 1.2%, 1.7% and 94.5%, 86.8%, 84.8%, 81.2% in the HPNAs monotherapy group (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.56-2.60, p = 0.64; HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.70-1.69, p = 0.72), respectively. The results were compatible with AMDA.

conclusionA similar HBV recurrence and overall survival were found in patients who used HPNAs (mainly entecavir) monotherapy as in those who received a combination of HPNAs and HBIG. These findings address concerns regarding the safety and effectiveness of HPNAs monotherapy.

Indexed as

Hepatitis BLiver TransplantationAntiviral AgentsDrug Therapy, CombinationHepatitis B virusHumansImmunoglobulinsRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeAntiviral AgentsImmunoglobulinsHepatitis B virusLiver transplantationOverall survivalProphylaxisRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID36592270
OpenAlexW4313424391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.