Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36592262›Full record

Observational studyInternational ophthalmology2023

Factors contributing to long-term refractive error after cataract surgery.

Natalie Si-Yi Lee, Keith Ong

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natalie Si-Yi LeeFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. n.s.lee@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9507-6379
Keith OngNorthern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate factors that may influence the direction and extent of long-term refractive error after cataract surgery.

methodsThis was a retrospective observational study conducted across two private practices in Sydney, NSW, Australia. The study population consisted of patients who underwent cataract phacoemulsification surgery between January 1 and December 31, 2018. Patients who received cataract surgery combined with another procedure were excluded. Demographic and biometric data including anterior chamber depth (ACD), keratometry, central corneal thickness, axial length (AL) and lens thickness were obtained pre-operatively. Spherical equivalent (SEQ) refraction was measured at 2 months and 3 years after surgery and compared with target refraction. Factors associated with refractive error were analyzed.

resultsThis study included 221 eyes of 122 patients. A refractive error within 1.00 D was achieved in 217 eyes (98.2%) at 3 years post-operatively. Mean prediction error decreased significantly between 2 months and 3 years after surgery irrespective of whether eyes were more myopic (p < 0.001) or more hypermetropic than predicted (p < .0001). Pre-operative ACD and ACD-to-AL ratio were significantly associated with SEQ prediction error.

conclusionAfter cataract surgery, refractive outcomes may be influenced by ACD and ACD-to-AL ratio. The pre-operative assessment of these risk factors may better inform IOL selection in individual patients. Prospective studies in a larger cohort are required.

Indexed as

CataractLenses, IntraocularPhacoemulsificationRefractive ErrorsRefractive Surgical ProceduresBiometryCorneaHumansLens Implantation, IntraocularProspective StudiesRefraction, OcularRetrospective StudiesAnterior chamberCataract surgeryRefractive error

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.