ArticleActa diabetologica2023
Gender gaps in type 1 diabetes care.
Article in Acta diabetologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Determinants of Health-Related Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Sex differences in retinal neurovascular changes in type 1 diabetes without retinopathy.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Article
- Sex Differences in Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics and Glucose Variability in Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes Treated with Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop Therapy: An Observational, Retrospective, One-Year Follow-Up Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Gender Differences in Type 1 Diabetes Management and Mental Health Burden: Findings from a National Survey in Saudi Arabia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular disease in women with type 1 diabetes: a narrative review and insights from a population-based cohort analysis.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Review
- Current evidence on gender-related risk factors for type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes and prediabetes: a reappraisal of the Italian study group on gender difference in endocrine diseases.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2025Review
- The rising burden of diabetes and state-wise variations in India: insights from the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2021 and projections to 2031.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Ketoacidosis Presenting with Transient Severe Fatty Liver and Subsequent Liver Dysfunction.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Article
- Sex-Based Disparities in Treatment and Healthcare Utilization in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Sex inequalities in cardiovascular risk factors and their management in primary prevention in adults living with type 1 diabetes in Germany and France: findings from DPV and SFDT1.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2024Article
- Ten Years of Improving Glycemic Control in Pediatric Diabetes Care: Data From the Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry.Diabetes care · 2024Article
- Celiac Disease-Related Enamel Defects: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Area deprivation and demographic factors associated with diabetes technology use in adults with type 1 diabetes in Germany.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Gender Disparities in the Care of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Myth or Reality?Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimsDiabetes mellitus is one of the largest global health concerns of recent times. Women with diabetes mellitus have a higher excess risk of all-cause mortality and more vascular events than men. Focusing on type 1 diabetes, this could be caused by gender inequalities in delivered diabetes care. This study aims to assess gender differences in type 1 diabetes outpatient care, particularly diagnostics and outcomes.
methodsThis cross-sectional cohort study included all adult type 1 diabetes patients in the Dutch Pediatric and Adult Registry of Diabetes (DPARD) visiting diabetes outpatient clinics between 2016-2021. The frequency of process measurements, including physical examination and laboratory testing, was assessed among both sexes after adjustment for age and body mass index. Gender differences in eGFR ≥ 60, BMI-, and control in blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol were evaluated. Hospital variation in achieving HbA1c targets of 53 mmol/mol and median HbA1c were assessed. Cardiovascular risk scores were calculated in men and women using the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) European low-risk chart.
resultsOur study showed a 17% higher odds of reaching weight control and a 23% lower odds of achieving blood pressure targets in men than women. Gender-skewed cardiovascular mortality risk scores were found. Gender disparities in outcomes appear not to be caused by gender-biased attitudes in healthcare professionals since no gender differences were found in the performance of process measurements in type 1 diabetes care. In addition, hospitals appear to vary by extent of gender differences in achieving a target HbA1c of 53 mmol/mol.
conclusionGender equality exists in the diagnostic process of diabetes care. However, differences in weight control, blood pressure control, and cardiovascular mortality risk scores remain between both sexes, most likely due to multifactorial causes. Indications for interhospital variation in gender disparities in HbA1c control exist. Further focus on performance of process measurements between hospitals may identify areas for improvement of gender-skewed outcomes to further enhance Dutch diabetes care for both sexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.