Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36592205›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2023

How to use biomarkers of infection or sepsis at the bedside: guide to clinicians.

Pedro Póvoa, Luís Coelho, Felipe Dal-Pizzol, Ricard Ferrer, Angela Huttner, Andrew Conway Morris, Vandack Nobre, Paula Ramirez, Anahita Rouze, Jorge Salluh and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07398703 ("The Impact of Beta-Lactam Infusion Strategy on Treatment Efficacy in Sepsis and Septic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 174 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
174citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07398703 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

"The Impact of Beta-Lactam Infusion Strategy on Treatment Efficacy in Sepsis and Septic Shock : Extended vs. Intermittent Dosing in the ICU"

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAssiut UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsSepsis, Septic ShockArmsExtended beta-lactam antibiotics, Intermittent Beta-lactam antibiotics
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

174 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. ActivatableChemical science · 2026
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

114 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Pedro PóvoaNOVA Medical School, New University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal. pedrorpovoa@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7069-7304
Luís CoelhoNOVA Medical School, New University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0701-3624
Felipe Dal-PizzolLaboratory of Experimental Pathophysiology, Graduate Program in Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina (UNESC), Criciúma, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3003-8977
Ricard FerrerServei de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Institut de Recerca Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4859-4747
Angela HuttnerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8380-368X
Andrew Conway MorrisDivision of Anaesthesia, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3211-3216
Vandack NobreSchool of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7922-0422
Paula RamirezDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Universitario Y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7598-3350
Anahita RouzeCNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, UMR 8576 - U1285 - UGSF - Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, Service de Médecine Intensive - Réanimation, Université de Lille, 59000, Lille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1330-3161
Jorge SalluhPostgraduate Program, D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8164-1453
Mervyn SingerUniversity College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1042-6350
Daniel A SweeneyDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5398-3528
Antoni TorresServei de Pneumologia, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8643-2167
Grant WatererUniversity of Western Australia, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7222-8018
Andre C KalilDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6489-6294

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V006118/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. In this context, biomarkers could be considered as indicators of either infection or dysregulated host response or response to treatment and/or aid clinicians to prognosticate patient risk. More than 250 biomarkers have been identified and evaluated over the last few decades, but no biomarker accurately differentiates between sepsis and sepsis-like syndrome. Published data support the use of biomarkers for pathogen identification, clinical diagnosis, and optimization of antibiotic treatment. In this narrative review, we highlight how clinicians could improve the use of pathogen-specific and of the most used host-response biomarkers, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein, to improve the clinical care of patients with sepsis. Biomarker kinetics are more useful than single values in predicting sepsis, when making the diagnosis and assessing the response to antibiotic therapy. Finally, integrated biomarker-guided algorithms may hold promise to improve both the diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis. Herein, we provide current data on the clinical utility of pathogen-specific and host-response biomarkers, offer guidance on how to optimize their use, and propose the needs for future research.

Indexed as

SepsisAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinHumansProcalcitoninPrognosisAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinProcalcitoninAntibiotic stewardshipBiomarkersDiagnosisIntensive care unitSepsis

Identifiers

PMID36592205
PMCPMC9807102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.