Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36592183›Full record

ArticleHNO2023

[Suitability of determining percentage hearing loss for monitoring cochlear implant rehabilitation].

Oliver C Dziemba, Tina Brzoska, Friedrich Ihler, Chia-Jung Busch

Erratum issuedAbstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in HNO, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    2026
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oliver C DziembaKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenkrankheiten, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Str., 17475, Greifswald, Deutschland. oliver.dziemba@med.uni-greifswald.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0521-5671
Tina BrzoskaKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenkrankheiten, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Str., 17475, Greifswald, Deutschland.
Friedrich IhlerKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenkrankheiten, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Str., 17475, Greifswald, Deutschland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7066-4994
Chia-Jung BuschKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenkrankheiten, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Str., 17475, Greifswald, Deutschland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8254-8237

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCalculation of percentage hearing loss (pHV) from the pure-tune audiogram according to Röser in 1973 or from the speech audiogram according to Boenninghaus and Röser in 1973 is a method still applied for quantitative assessment of hearing. However, this is not common for the evaluation of postoperative results of implantable hearing systems. During the regular work-up after cochlear implantation (CI) in Germany, all necessary parameters are available for calculation of pHV either from categorical loudness scaling (pHV

objectiveThe parameters pHV MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study comprises retrospective chart review of audiological parameters from 66 CI procedures in one tertiary referral center. pHV

resultsWhile pHV

conclusionIt is possible to calculate pHV

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsDeafnessHearing LossSpeech PerceptionAudiometry, Pure-ToneHumansRetrospective StudiesCochlear implantLoudness scalingQuality controlRehabilitationSpeech audiometry

Identifiers

PMID36592183
PMCPMC9894973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.