Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36591793›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2023

Barriers and communication behaviors impacting referral to sleep surgery: qualitative patient perspectives.

Allison K Ikeda, Crystina McShay, Robin Marsh, Shireen Saini, Maya Sardesai, Emily F Boss, Edward M Weaver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Public engagement with consumer sleep technology for obstructive sleep apnea screening: implications for equity, access, and practice.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Allison K IkedaUniversity of Washington, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seattle, Washington.
Crystina McShayUniversity of Washington, Department of Human Centered Design and Engineering, Seattle, Washington.
Robin MarshUniversity of Washington, Department of Human Centered Design and Engineering, Seattle, Washington.
Shireen SainiUniversity of Washington, Department of Human Centered Design and Engineering, Seattle, Washington.
Maya SardesaiUniversity of Washington, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seattle, Washington.
Emily F BossJohns Hopkins University, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baltimore, Maryland.
Edward M WeaverUniversity of Washington, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

Research Training in OtolaryngologyT32DC000018 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STONE, JENNIFER S. · 1989 to 2023
$7.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesPhysician-patient interactions influence the immediate encounter and leave lasting impressions for future health care encounters. We aimed to understand patient experiences and decision-making for considering sleep surgery, in terms of barriers and communication behaviors that facilitate or hinder referral for consideration of sleep surgery management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) when continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy has failed.

methodsWe employed qualitative methods, using semistructured interviews of adults with OSA who presented for sleep surgery consultation after unsatisfactory therapy with CPAP. Open-ended questions traced symptoms and progression of sleep apnea burden, trials of noninvasive OSA therapies, outcomes, and patient expectations and concerns. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using content analysis to identify themes.

resultsTen adult patients with OSA were enrolled March through April 2021 and reached predominant thematic saturation. Barriers to sleep surgery consultation included: (1) delays in OSA diagnosis due to limited OSA awareness among patients or primary providers and patients' perceived inconvenience of sleep testing, (2) patients faulted for slow progress, (3) patient-reported lack of urgency by providers in troubleshooting noninvasive management options, (4) scheduling delays and waitlists, and (5) cost. Patients were receptive to noninvasive treatment options, but inadequate improvement led to frustration after multiple encounters. Patients appreciated empathetic providers who shared information through transparent and understandable explanations and who presented multiple treatment options.

conclusionsExperiences of patients with OSA highlight the need for shared decision-making through improved communication of unresolved concerns and alternative management options, including timely referral for sleep surgery consultation when indicated. CITATION: Ikeda AK, McShay C, Marsh R, et al. Barriers and communication behaviors impacting referral to sleep surgery: qualitative patient perspectives.

Indexed as

CommunicationHealth Services AccessibilityPhysician-Patient RelationsReferral and ConsultationSleep Apnea, ObstructiveAdultContinuous Positive Airway PressureHumansTreatment Failurebarrierscommunication behaviorsobstructive sleep apneapatient perspectivesqualitative methods

Identifiers

PMID36591793
PMCPMC9806776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.