Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36591581›Full record

ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry : JCD

Evaluation of push-out bond strength of different concentrations of chitosan nanoparticles incorporated composite resin and eighth-generation bonding agent for class II restoration: An

Rahul S Halkai, Snigdha Priya Gopinagaruri, Kiran R Halkai, Arshad Hussain, Janavathi Rangappa, S Firdoush Reshma

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025
    Article
  5. Revolutionizing dental restorations with nanoparticle-incorporated composites.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rahul S HalkaiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Al Badar Rural Dental College and Hospital, Kalaburgi, Karnataka, India.
Snigdha Priya GopinagaruriDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Al Badar Rural Dental College and Hospital, Kalaburgi, Karnataka, India.
Kiran R HalkaiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Al Badar Rural Dental College and Hospital, Kalaburgi, Karnataka, India.
Arshad HussainDepartment of Orthodontics, Al Badar Rural Dental College and Hospital, Kalaburgi, Karnataka, India.
Janavathi RangappaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Al Badar Rural Dental College and Hospital, Kalaburgi, Karnataka, India.
S Firdoush ReshmaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Al Badar Rural Dental College and Hospital, Kalaburgi, Karnataka, India.
MNR Dental College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the push-out bonding strength of class II cavities of maxillary molars restored with different concentrations of chitosan nanoparticles (CSN) incorporated in universal composite resin and eighth-generation dentin bonding agent (DBA). Materials and Methods: Seventy extracted human maxillary first molar teeth were cleaned and mounted in acrylic mold up to 2 mm below cementoenamel junction and mesio-occlusal Class II cavities with standard measurements were prepared. CSN 2% and 0.25% powder were added to the DBA and composite resin. The samples then arbitrarily divided into three groups for restoration: Group 1: composite restoration without CSN (control group) ( Results: Subgroup 3A (0.25% CSN + composite) has shown an increase in bond strength among all experimental groups with no significant difference between group 1 (control group). Conclusion: CSN 0.25% incorporated in composite or DBA exhibits no harmful effect on the bond strength of class II restorations. Hence, it can be used to improve the antibacterial action and longevity of composite resin.

Indexed as

Chitosan nanoparticlescomposite restorationposterior restorationspush-out bond strength

Identifiers

PMID36591581
PMCPMC9795684
OpenAlexW4312413426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.