ReviewJournal of conservative dentistry : JCD
Evaluation of coronal microleakage of intra-orifice barrier materials in endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mapping risk of bias criteria in systematic reviews of in vitro endodontic studies: an umbrella review.Evidence-based dentistry · 2025Pooled it
- Internal bleaching: Comparing the effectiveness of Opalescence Endo and 30% hydrogen peroxide with sodium perborate - A randomized clinical trial.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Coronal microleakage of two intraorifice bioceramic barriers in single-rooted premolars:Dental research journal · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Microhardness and Compressive Strength of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Modified by Addition of Short Glass Fibers and Shredded Polyglycolic Acid Sutures.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Microscopic evaluation of microleakage in retrograde filling materials using conventional and ultrasonic techniques.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Article
- Expert consensus on the diagnosis and therapy of endo-periodontal lesions.International journal of oral science · 2024Review
- Successful Management of a Rare Distant Endodontic Lesion: A Case Report.Iranian endodontic journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Comparison of coronal sealing of flowable composite, resin-modified glass ionomer, and mineral trioxide aggregate in endodontically treated teeth: AnDental research journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endodontic success depends on complete sealing of the root canal orifice to prevent re-infection and re-Contamination of the treated teeth through microleakage. Intra-orifice barrier material provides a seal against micro-organisms, its by-products thus, preventing microleakage and subsequent endodontic failure. Several studies have been done to evaluate microleakage after placing various materials as IOB, but still there is no standardization for the same. Thus, this systematic review was conducted to evaluate the microleakage associated with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), composite, and glass ionomer cement (GIC) when used as IOB material. Materials and Methods: Protocol was formulated in accordance with PRISMA checklist 2020 and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021226225). Electronic search from databases such as Medline/PubMed, Scopus, EBSCOhost, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane were performed from the year 2000-2020. Results: All studies included in this systematic review reported that placement of an IOB material significantly reduces microleakage as compared to control groups. MTA used as an IOB showed less microleakage than composite and GIC. Conclusion: MTA as IOB material demonstrated the least microleakage
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.