Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36591474›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Nanopore sequencing of clonal IGH rearrangements in cell-free DNA as a biomarker for acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Shilpa Sampathi, Yelena Chernyavskaya, Meghan G Haney, L Henry Moore, Isabel A Snyder, Anna H Cox, Brittany L Fuller, Tamara J Taylor, Donglin Yan, Tom C Badgett and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shilpa SampathiDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Yelena ChernyavskayaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Meghan G HaneyDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
L Henry MooreDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Isabel A SnyderDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Anna H CoxDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Brittany L FullerDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Tamara J TaylorDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Donglin YanMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Tom C BadgettDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Jessica S BlackburnDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
University of Kentucky · USMarkey Cancer Center · US

Funding

The Phosphatase PRL3 as a MYC Target and Pro-Survival Oncogene in Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaR37CA227656 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI BLACKBURN, JESSICA S. · 2018 to 2024
$2.4M
Harnessing Single Cell Technology to Define Self-Renewal in Normal and Malignant Stem CellsDP2CA228043 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI BLACKBURN, JESSICA S. · 2017 to 2017
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS DP2 CA228043NCI NIH HHS R37 CA227656
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) is the most common pediatric cancer, and patients with relapsed ALL have a poor prognosis. Detection of ALL blasts remaining at the end of treatment, or minimal residual disease (MRD), and spread of ALL into the central nervous system (CNS) have prognostic importance in ALL. Current methods to detect MRD and CNS disease in ALL rely on the presence of ALL blasts in patient samples. Cell-free DNA, or small fragments of DNA released by cancer cells into patient biofluids, has emerged as a robust and sensitive biomarker to assess cancer burden, although cfDNA analysis has not previously been applied to ALL. Methods: We present a simple and rapid workflow based on NanoporeMinION sequencing of PCR amplified B cell-specific rearrangement of the (IGH) locus in cfDNA from B-ALL patient samples. A cohort of 5 pediatric B-ALL patient samples was chosen for the study based on the MRD and CNS disease status. Results: Quantitation of IGH-variable sequences in cfDNA allowed us to detect clonal heterogeneity and track the response of individual B-ALL clones throughout treatment. cfDNA was detected in patient biofluids with clinical diagnoses of MRD and CNS disease, and leukemic clones could be detected even when diagnostic cell-count thresholds for MRD were not met. These data suggest that cfDNA assays may be useful in detecting the presence of ALL in the patient, even when blasts are not physically present in the biofluid sample. Conclusions: The Nanopore IGH detection workflow to monitor cell-free DNA is a simple, rapid, and inexpensive assay that may ultimately serve as a valuable complement to traditional clinical diagnostic approaches for ALL.

Indexed as

B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL)central nervous system (CNS) diseaseclonalityminimal residual disease (MRD)relapseVDJ rearrangement

Identifiers

PMID36591474
PMCPMC9795051
OpenAlexW4311366667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.