Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36591337›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2022

Creating a sustainable action-oriented engagement infrastructure-a UMN-MIDB perspective.

Anita C Randolph, Alex Henry, Amy Hewitt, Angie P Mejia, Raj Sethuraju, Meriah DeJoseph, Melissa Koenig, Jed T Elison, Damien A Fair

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anita C RandolphMasonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Alex HenryMasonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Amy HewittMasonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Angie P MejiaCenter of Learning Innovation, University of Minnesota-Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.
Raj SethurajuSchool of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Metropolitan State University, Saint Paul, MN, United States.
Meriah DeJosephInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Melissa KoenigInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Jed T ElisonMasonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Damien A FairMasonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the murder of George Floyd on May 25, 2020, Minneapolis represented the epicenter of protests that would reverberate internationally and re-instantiate a reckoning of the systemic and institutional racism that plagues American society. Also in the summer of 2020, and after several years of planning, the University of Minnesota (UMN) launched the Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain (MIDB), an interdisciplinary clinical and community research enterprise designed to create knowledge and engage all members of our community. In what follows, we describe the mission of the MIDB Community Engagement and Education (CEEd) Core and adjacent efforts within the UMN neuroscience and psychology community. Inherent to these efforts is the explicit attempt to de-center the dominant academic voice and affirm knowledge creation is augmented by diverse voices within and outside of traditional academic institutions. We describe several initiatives, including the Neuroscience Opportunities for Discovery and Equity (NODE) network, the NextGen Psych Scholars Program (NPSP), the Young Scientist Program, among others as exemplars of our approach. Developing and fortifying sustainable pathways for authentic community-academic partnerships are of central importance to enhance mutually beneficial scientific discovery. We posit that traditional academic approaches to community engagement to benefit the institution are severely constrained and perpetuate inherently exploitative power dynamics between academic institutions and communities.

Indexed as

community engagementdiversifying STEAMdiversityinequities in educationinfrastructure buildingneuroscience

Identifiers

PMID36591337
PMCPMC9797530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.