Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36591154›Full record

ReviewACS omega2022

Critical Assessment of the Sustainability of Deep Eutectic Solvents: A Case Study on Six Choline Chloride-Based Mixtures.

Stefano Nejrotti, Achille Antenucci, Carlotta Pontremoli, Lorenzo Gontrani, Nadia Barbero, Marilena Carbone, Matteo Bonomo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Untapped Potential of Deep Eutectic Solvents for the Synthesis of Bioinspired Inorganic-Organic Materials.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stefano NejrottiDepartment of Chemistry, NIS Interdepartmental Centre and INSTM Reference Centre, University of Torino, Via Gioacchino Quarello 15/a, 10125 Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6017-5705
Achille AntenucciDepartment of Chemistry, NIS Interdepartmental Centre and INSTM Reference Centre, University of Torino, Via Gioacchino Quarello 15/a, 10125 Torino, Italy.
Carlotta PontremoliDepartment of Chemistry, NIS Interdepartmental Centre and INSTM Reference Centre, University of Torino, Via Gioacchino Quarello 15/a, 10125 Torino, Italy.
Lorenzo GontraniDepartment of Chemical Science and Technologies, University of Rome, Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133, Roma, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8212-7029
Nadia BarberoDepartment of Chemistry, NIS Interdepartmental Centre and INSTM Reference Centre, University of Torino, Via Gioacchino Quarello 15/a, 10125 Torino, Italy.
Marilena CarboneDepartment of Chemical Science and Technologies, University of Rome, Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133, Roma, Italy.
Matteo BonomoDepartment of Chemistry, NIS Interdepartmental Centre and INSTM Reference Centre, University of Torino, Via Gioacchino Quarello 15/a, 10125 Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1944-2664

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An outline of the advantages, in terms of sustainability, of Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs) is provided, by analyzing some of the most popular DESs, obtained by the combination of choline chloride, as a hydrogen bond acceptor, and six hydrogen bond donors. The analysis is articulated into four main issues related to sustainability, which are recurrently mentioned in the literature, but are often taken for granted without any further critical elaboration, as the prominent green features of DESs: their low toxicity, good biodegradability, renewable sourcing, and low cost. This contribution is intended to provide a more tangible, evidence-based evaluation of the actual green credentials of the considered DESs, to reinforce or question their supposed sustainability, also in mutual comparison with one another.

Identifiers

PMID36591154
PMCPMC9798394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.