ReviewACS omega2022
Recent Advances in the Development of Oxidoreductase-Based Biosensors for Detection of Phenolic Antioxidants in Food and Beverages.
Review in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enzyme-immobilized graphene oxide-based electrochemical biosensor for glutathione detection.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Advancements in Biosensors for Lipid Peroxidation and Antioxidant Protection in Food: A Critical Review.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The Chronic Toxicity of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemical toInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antioxidants are known to exhibit a protective effect against reactive oxygen species (ROS)-related oxidative damage. As a result, inclusion of exogenous antioxidants in the diet has greatly increased. In this sense, detection and quantification of such antioxidants in various food and beverage items are of eminent importance. Monophenols and polyphenols are among the most prominent natural antioxidants. In this regard, biosensors have emerged as a simple, fast, and economical method for determination of such antioxidants. Owing to the fact that majority of the phenolic antioxidants are electroactive, oxidoreductase enzymes are the most extensively availed bioreceptors for their detection. Herein, the different types of oxidoreductases that have been utilized in biosensors for the biorecognition and quantification of natural phenolic compounds commonly present in foods and beverages are discussed. Apart from the most accustomed electrochemical biosensors, this review sheds light on the alternative transduction systems for the detection of phenolic antioxidants. Recent advances in the strategies involved in enzyme immobilization and surface modification of the biosensing platform are analyzed. This review aims to provide a brief overview of the latest developments in biosensor technology for phenolic antioxidant analysis in foodstuffs and future directions in this field.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.