Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36591020›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

Therapists' experiences of remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Andrew Morgan, Cari Davies, Yasmine Olabi, Laura Hope-Stone, Mary Gemma Cherry, Peter Fisher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew MorganPrimary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Cari DaviesPrimary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Yasmine OlabiPrimary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Laura Hope-StonePrimary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Mary Gemma CherryPrimary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Peter FisherPrimary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
University of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the experiences of therapists who delivered remote psychological therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design: This was a qualitative, phenomenological study. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis elicited themes from semi-structured interviews. Methods: A purposive sample of eight therapists was recruited from breast cancer services in the United Kingdom. Results: Analysis identified three superordinate themes. Participants spoke about how their experience of remote working changed over time from an initial crisis response to a new status quo. They adapted to the specific practical and personal challenges of remote working and struggled to connect with clients as the use of technology fundamentally changed the experience of therapy. Conclusion: Consideration should be given to the impact of remote working on therapists and the quality of their practise. Adjustments to ways of working can help to maximize the advantages of remote working while minimizing potential issues.

Indexed as

cancerCOVID-19interpretative phenomenological analysisqualitativeremote therapy

Identifiers

PMID36591020
PMCPMC9802664
OpenAlexW4313272702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.