ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Computed tomography-based assessment of radiographic progression in spine and sacroiliac joints after pregnancy in women with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Sacroiliac Joint Shape in Women with Ankylosing Spondylitis According to Mode of Birth Delivery: A Retrospective Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mechanical stress are one of the pathogenesis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). During pregnancy, the mechanical overload on the spine and pelvis increases due to gravid uterus. We aimed to investigate whether pregnancy affects radiographic progression in patients with radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA) based on computed tomography (CT) evaluations. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included women with r-axSpA aged 19-49 years who underwent at least two CT evaluations of the whole spine and/or sacroiliac joints (SIJs) at intervals of 2-4 years. To compare radiographic progression after delivery, we classified the patients into two groups: delivery group and controls. The delivery group was restricted to women who had the first CT ∼2 years before delivery and the second CT ∼2 years after delivery. The CT Syndesmophyte Score (CTSS) (0-522) and SIJ scores (0-40) were used to evaluate spinal syndesmophytes and erosion, joint space narrowing, and sclerosis of the SIJs. Results: A total of 21 women in the delivery group and 38 women in the control group were included. The median (Q1-Q3) CTSS at baseline in the delivery group and controls was 19 (16-23) and 20 (13.25-27.75), and the median progression was 1 (0-3) and 0 (0-1) during the median 2.9-year follow-up, respectively. The median (Q1-Q3) SIJ score at baseline in the delivery group and controls was 13 (8-22) and 11 (6-22), and the median progression was 1.5 (0-3) and 1 (0-2), respectively. Using cut-off 0.5, 52.9, and 61.9% of r-axSpA patients and 39.3 and 44.4% of controls showed progression of whole spine and SIJs, respectively. However, no difference in proportion of spinal and SIJ progression and absolute score changes per time point was observed between two groups. Moreover, the SIJ score changes were comparable according to the delivery method. Conclusion: Pregnancy and delivery do not affect the radiographic progression of the spine and SIJs in women with r-axSpA assessed by CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.