ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Case report: An intraretinal macrocyst with crystalline content and retinal detachment.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Case of Total Retinal Detachment With Multiple Retinal Cysts Showing a Favorable Postoperative Course.Cureus · 2025Article
- Retinal detachment with multiple macrocysts in Stickler syndrome: case report and review of the literature.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Idiopathic Giant Retinal Cyst: A Case Report.Case reports in ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: An intraretinal macrocyst is a cavity located in the outer plexiform layer of the retina. It is commonly filled with liquid or blood. To date, few case reports of intraretinal macrocysts with crystalline content and retinal detachment have been published. Case presentation: A 44-year-old woman with no history of other diseases complained of decreased vision in her right eye that had persisted for 20 days. The best corrected visual acuity of the right eye was hand motion. Comprehensive ophthalmic examinations were performed, including a vision test, slit lamp fundus examination, ocular B-scan ultrasound, and orbital magnetic resonance imaging. We performed vitrectomy and retinotomy to sufficiently remove the macrocyst and relieve retinal traction. We then reattached the retina and filled it with silicone oil. During the surgery, we found that the cyst had crystalline content, which has not been previously reported, to the best of our knowledge. Finally, the pathological results confirmed a final diagnosis of intraretinal macrocyst. Six months later, we performed a second operation to remove the silicone oil and implant an intraocular lens. After both surgeries, the best corrected visual acuity of the patient's right eye was restored to 20/200, and the retina had repositioned. Conclusion: Intraretinal macrocysts are very rare. Both orbital magnetic resonance imaging and ocular B-scan ultrasound are essential for their diagnosis. Our results indicated that vitrectomy was the best way to remove the cyst and reattach the retina.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.