Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36590888›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2022

Patient Willingness to Dispose of Leftover Opioids After Surgery: A Mixed Methods Study.

Phoebe Draper, Josh Bleicher, Jaqueline K Kobayashi, Elizabeth L Stauder, Gregory J Stoddard, Jordan E Johnson, Jessica N Cohan, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Alex H S Harris, Lyen C Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Drug disposal deserts: An assessment of receptacle availability in Kentucky community pharmacies.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Phoebe DraperRonald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University Langone Health, New York City, NY.
Josh BleicherDepartment of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Jaqueline K KobayashiDepartment of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Elizabeth L StauderDepartment of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Gregory J StoddardDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Jordan E JohnsonDepartment of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Jessica N CohanDepartment of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Kimberly A KaphingstHuntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT.
Alex H S HarrisDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Lyen C HuangDepartment of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

Funding

Vascular Health and Risk Factors in Children with Down SyndromeKL2TR002539 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MURTAUGH, MAUREEN A, NYGAARD, INGRID E · 2018 to 2022
$4.3M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined how convenience and financial incentives influence patient willingness to dispose of leftover prescription opioids after surgery. We also identified additional barriers and facilitators to disposal. Background: In the United States, up to 70% of surgical patients are prescribed opioids and up to 92% will have leftover tablets. Most do not dispose of leftover opioids, increasing the risk for opioid-related harm. Current interventions promoting opioid disposal have shown mixed success. Methods: We conducted a mixed methods study using a standard gamble survey and semi-structured interviews. Participants estimated willingness to dispose in 16 scenarios with varying convenience (time requirements of <5, 15, 30, and 60 minutes) and financial incentives ($0, $5, $25, $50). We estimated the likelihood of disposal using a multivariable mixed effects modified Poisson regression model. Semi-structured interviews explored how convenience, financial incentives, and other barriers and facilitators influenced decisions to dispose. Results: Fifty-five participants were surveyed and 42 were interviewed. Most were willing to dispose when the time required was <15 minutes. Few were willing to dispose if the process required 60 minutes, although a $50 financial incentive increased rates from 9% to 36%. Anxiety about future pain, opioid scarcity, recreational use, family safety, moral beliefs, addiction, theft, and environmental harm also influenced decision-making. Conclusions: Interventions promoting opioid disposal should focus on convenience, but the selective use of financial incentives can be effective. Tailoring interventions to individual barriers and facilitators could also increase disposal rates.

Indexed as

acute painanalgesicfinancial incentivemedical waste disposalmixed methodsopioidsopioid stewardshipprescription drug misusesurgery

Identifiers

PMID36590888
PMCPMC9780041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.