ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2023
Safety of mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations in patients with allergic diseases.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the degree of safety and possible risk of acute allergic reactions following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination among a group of patients predisposed to allergic diseases. Study design: The study survey took place between May 2021 and February 2022. Each participant completed an initial pre-vaccination questionnaire during patient eligibility assessment for vaccination, and two subsequent questionnaires were completed approximately 21 days after the first and second doses of vaccination. Methods: The study included 52 patients aged >18 years. Participants were a select group of patients who, due to a history of severe allergic disease, were not eligible for vaccination at the COVID-19 Vaccination Points available in Poland. Results: None of the patients developed serious allergic complications in the form of anaphylaxis. There were no statistically significant differences between the first vaccination and the second vaccination in terms of symptoms, the time of onset and duration. The age of the participants did not correlate statistically with the occurrence of symptoms following the first or second vaccination. Conclusions: Based on the study results, it can be concluded that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines show a favourable safety profile for patients with a history of allergic disease and constitute the optimal strategy for fighting the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The study results support the recommendation of COVID-19 vaccinations for people predisposed to allergic diseases due to the clear benefits of vaccination over the possible risk of adverse events.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.