Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36590723›Full record

ArticleJTCVS open2022

Putting patient value first: Using a modified nominal group technique for the implementation of enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery recommendations.

Mudra G Dave, Anna M Chudyk, Nebojša Oravec, David E Kent, Todd A Duhamel, Annette S H Schultz, Rakesh C Arora

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Priorities for prehabilitation for patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer: a nominal group consensus study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mudra G DaveFaculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Anna M ChudykSt Boniface Research Centre, Health Services & Structural Determinants of Health Research, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Nebojša OravecMax Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
David E KentFaculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Todd A DuhamelFaculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Annette S H SchultzSt Boniface Research Centre, Health Services & Structural Determinants of Health Research, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Rakesh C AroraCardiac Sciences Manitoba, St Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
University of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: In 2019, the Society for Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERAS-CS) published perioperative guidelines to optimize the care of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. For centers with limited capacity, a sequential approach to the implementation of the full guidelines may be more feasible. Therefore, we aimed to explore the priority of implementation of the ERAS-CS guideline recommendations from a patient and caregiver perspective. Methods: Using a modified nominal group technique, individuals who previously underwent cardiac surgery and their caregivers ranked ERAS-CS recommendations within 3 time points (ie, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative) and across 2 to 3 voting rounds. Final round rankings (median, mean and first quartile) were used to determine relative priorities. Results: Seven individuals (5 patients and 2 caregivers) participated in the study. Patient engagement tools (2, 2.29, and 1.50), surgical site infection reduction (2, 1.67, and 1.25), and postoperative systematic delirium screening (1, 2.43, and 1.00) were the top-ranked ERAS-CS recommendations in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative time points, respectively. Conclusions: Exploration of patient and caregiver priorities may provide important insights to guide the healthcare team with clinical pathway development and implementation. Further study is needed to understand the impact of the integration of patient and caregiver values on effective and sustainable clinical pathway implementation.

Indexed as

cardiac surgeryenhanced recovery protocolsERAS-CS, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery–Cardiac SurgeryNGT, nominal group techniquenominal group techniquepatient-centeredperioperative guidelinesPONV, postoperative nausea and vomitingQ1, first quartileSSI, surgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID36590723
PMCPMC9801247
OpenAlexW4286252790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.