Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36590639›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Recognition of social health: A conceptual framework in the context of dementia research.

Myrra Vernooij-Dassen, Eline Verspoor, Suraj Samtani, Perminder S Sachdev, M Arfan Ikram, Meike W Vernooij, Claudia Hubers, Rabih Chattat, Marta Lenart-Bugla, Joanna Rymaszewska and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A multilevel conceptual framework for dementia: from life-course mechanisms to public health strategies.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Myrra Vernooij-DassenScientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Eline VerspoorDepartment Geriatric Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Suraj SamtaniDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Perminder S SachdevDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
M Arfan IkramDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Meike W VernooijDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Claudia HubersDepartment Geriatric Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Rabih ChattatDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Marta Lenart-BuglaDepartment of Psychiatry, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Joanna RymaszewskaDepartment of Psychiatry, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Dorota SzczesniakDepartment of Psychiatry, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Henry BrodatyDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Anna-Karin WelmerDepartment of Neurobiology Care Sciences and Society, Aging Research Center & Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jane MaddockMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL, Faculty of Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Isabelle F van der VelpenDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Henrik WiegelmannDepartment of Nursing Science Research, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Anna MarsegliaDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marcus RichardsMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL, Faculty of Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Rene MelisDepartment Geriatric Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Marjolein de VugtDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neurosciences, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Alzheimer Centrum Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherland.
Esme Moniz-CookDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.
Yun-Hee JeonSusan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Marieke PerryDepartment Geriatric Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Karin Wolf-OstermannDepartment of Nursing Science Research, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00019/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The recognition of dementia as a multifactorial disorder encourages the exploration of new pathways to understand its origins. Social health might play a role in cognitive decline and dementia, but conceptual clarity is lacking and this hinders investigation of associations and mechanisms. The objective is to develop a conceptual framework for social health to advance conceptual clarity in future studies. Process: We use the following steps: underpinning for concept advancement, concept advancement by the development of a conceptual model, and exploration of its potential feasibility. An iterative consensus-based process was used within the international multidisciplinary SHARED project. Conceptual framework: Underpinning of the concept drew from a synthesis of theoretical, conceptual and epidemiological work, and resulted in a definition of social health as wellbeing that relies on capacities both of the individual and the social environment. Consequently, domains in the conceptual framework are on both the individual (e.g., social participation) and the social environmental levels (e.g., social network). We hypothesize that social health acts as a driver for use of cognitive reserve which can then slow cognitive impairment or maintain cognitive functioning. The feasibility of the conceptual framework is demonstrated in its practical use in identifying and structuring of social health markers within the SHARED project. Discussion: The conceptual framework provides guidance for future research and facilitates identification of modifiable risk and protective factors, which may in turn shape new avenues for preventive interventions. We highlight the paradigm of social health in dementia as a priority for dementia research.

Indexed as

cognitive reserveconcept advancementconceptual frameworkdementia preventionepidemiologysocial health

Identifiers

PMID36590639
PMCPMC9798783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.