ArticleHeliyon2022
Comparative phenolic, chromatic, and sensory composition of five monovarietal wines processed with microwave technology.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Traditional and Emerging Maceration Techniques in Red Winemaking: Extraction Mechanisms Shaping Phenolic Composition, Volatile Profile, and Sensory Expression.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the Winemaking Characteristics of High Anthocyanin Teinturier Grape Varieties (Lines).Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- BRS Carmem Grape Liqueurs: Influence of Alcoholic Base on Physicochemical Characteristics, Anthocyanin Composition, and Sensory Acceptance.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Impact of Two Elicitors and Harvest Ripening Stage on the Quality of Monastrell Grapes and Wines.Biomolecules · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effect of MW technology (1,200 Watts for 10 min) on the chemical and sensory composition of five monovarietal wines with different phenolic composition was studied relative to untreated Control wines. MW improved polymeric pigment content by 30, 22 and 31% in Cabernet Sauvignon, Malbec, and Syrah wines, respectively, and anthocyanin extraction and non-tannin phenolics by 24% in Malbec and Syrah wines, respectively. In Nebbiolo and Pinot noir, MW had no effect on phenolics or chromatic characteristics. Anthocyanins in Nebbiolo wines were the lowest and their pigment profile was composed of 18% pyranoanthocyanins, but tannins were the highest, resulting in a tannin to anthocyanin ratio of 16. Pinot noir and Nebbiolo wines had comparable polymeric pigment content, despite dissimilar tannin to anthocyanin ratios, suggesting different mouthfeel characteristics in their respective wines. Conversely, wines of comparable tannin to anthocyanin produced wines of vastly different polymeric pigment content. MW-treated Cabernet Sauvignon wines showed an improved sensory profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.