ArticleHeliyon2022
Obesity screening in the pediatric emergency department - A missed opportunity?
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: There is a low rate of body mass index measurements and obesity screening in primary pediatric care. Pediatric emergency department (PED) visits, with their large volumes and routine weight measurements, provide a unique opportunity to identify and address obesity. The study objectives were to examine the rate of addressing obesity in the PED and to identify its predicting factors. Methods: From electronic medical records of PED visits during 2010-2019, we extracted data on age, gender, weight, time, listed diagnoses, and discharge texts. The primary outcome was a listed diagnosis of "obesity" on discharge letters of children with obesity. Secondary outcomes were addressing weight in the discharge letter and written recommendations for obesity-related treatment. Mixed models were used to test for associations between each of the three outcomes and patient/visit characteristics. Results: There were 150,250 PED visits by 88,253 different children and adolescents. Obesity was found in 10,691 children (12.1%). Among these, listed "obesity" diagnosis was present in only 240 (1.5%) visits. Text addressing overweight/obesity was recorded in 721 (4.4%) visits, and weight-related recommendations were documented in 716 (4.4%) visits. "Obesity" was documented in females more often than in males, in older children, in children with higher weights, and in visits conducted during the mornings. Conclusions: The rate of obesity diagnosis in the PED was extremely low, hence the potential screening ability of the PED in this matter is highly under-utilized. PEDs could increase the recognition of obesity, thus assisting in the global efforts in tackling this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.