Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36590473›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

The safety of BCG vaccination in cattle: results from good laboratory practice safety studies in calves and lactating cows.

Gareth A Williams, Emer Scott-Baird, Alejandro Núñez, Francisco J Salguero, Emma Wood, Steve Houghton, H Martin Vordermeier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. JDS communications · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Specific and non-specific effects ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gareth A WilliamsAnimal and Plant Health Agency (APHA), Addlestone, Surrey, KT15 3NB, UK.
Emer Scott-BairdDrayton Animal Health, Stratford-upon-Avon, Warks, CV37 9RQ, UK.
Alejandro NúñezAnimal and Plant Health Agency (APHA), Addlestone, Surrey, KT15 3NB, UK.
Francisco J SalgueroUnited Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Salisbury, Wilts, SP4 0JG, UK.
Emma WoodQueens Hall, Narberth, Pembs, SA67 7AS, UK.
Steve HoughtonVeterinary Vaccines Consultancy Ltd, Paulerspury, Northants, NN12 7NN, UK.
H Martin VordermeierAnimal and Plant Health Agency (APHA), Addlestone, Surrey, KT15 3NB, UK.
Animal and Plant Health Agency · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a global disease of livestock that has damaging economic, animal health and public health consequences. Conventional bTB disease control strategies, based around the testing and slaughter of cattle infected with bTB, are typically used to help limit or reduce the transmission of this disease but in many low- and middle-income countries such strategies may often be economically unviable, culturally unacceptable or logistically impracticable. The use of vaccination to protect cattle against bTB could provide a potentially more affordable, ethically acceptable and practical additional disease control measure. The protective efficacy of the commercially produced and readily available human vaccine against tuberculosis (

Indexed as

BCG vaccineBovine tuberculosisGood laboratory practiceRegulatory studiesSafety data

Identifiers

PMID36590473
PMCPMC9800532
OpenAlexW4311609040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.