Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36590445›Full record

ArticleVaccine: X2023

Acute adverse events of Sars-CoV2 vaccines: Experiences from a health care worker vaccination campaign in two municipal hospitals in northwest Germany.

Pawel Kermer, Yasser Abdalla, Guido Klein, Claus Lüers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pawel KermerNordwest-Krankenhaus Sanderbusch, Friesland Kliniken gGmbH, Sande, Germany.
Yasser AbdallaNordwest-Krankenhaus Sanderbusch, Friesland Kliniken gGmbH, Sande, Germany.
Guido KleinSt. Johannes-Hospital, Friesland Kliniken gGmbH, Varel, Germany.
Claus LüersNordwest-Krankenhaus Sanderbusch, Friesland Kliniken gGmbH, Sande, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination is considered the best measure to overcome the Sars-Cov2 pandemic. However, changing national recommendations on sequence and time frame necessitate the collection of real-word data on adverse events of Sars-CoV2 vaccination protocols outside of pivotal trials. We report results from a survey on the adverse events and the operational consequences of a Sars-CoV2 vaccination campaign with partly mixed vaccination protocol as well as booster vaccination. While the spectrum of adverse effects in our cohort appeared to be similar to pivotal studies, there were substantial differences in both frequency and distribution with only 3 out of 10 participants staying symptom-free. In over 26% of vaccinees symptoms were so severe, that they stayed at home with mean days on sick leave being 1.5 per person using mixed vaccination protocol. Being aware, that these results might partially be attributable to nocebo effects they are of importance for future vaccination campaigns.

Indexed as

Adverse eventsBooster vaccinationSars-CoV2Sick leaveVaccine

Identifiers

PMID36590445
PMCPMC9794527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.