Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36590336›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2022

From spawner habitat selection to stock-recruitment: Implications for assessment.

Stefan Skoglund, Rebecca Whitlock, Erik Petersson, Stefan Palm, Kjell Leonardsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stefan SkoglundDepartment of Aquatic Resources, Institute of Freshwater Research Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Drottiningholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3110-2854
Rebecca WhitlockDepartment of Aquatic Resources, Institute of Freshwater Research Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Drottiningholm Sweden.
Erik PeterssonDepartment of Aquatic Resources, Institute of Freshwater Research Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Drottiningholm Sweden.
Stefan PalmDepartment of Aquatic Resources, Institute of Freshwater Research Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Drottiningholm Sweden.
Kjell LeonardssonDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Umeå Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between the spawning stock size and subsequent number of recruits is a central concept in fisheries ecology. The influence of habitat selection of spawning individuals on the stock-recruitment relationship is poorly known. Here we explore how each of four different spawner behaviors might influence the stock-recruitment relationship and estimates of its parameters in the two most commonly used stock-recruitment functions (Beverton-Holt and Ricker). Using simulated stock-recruitment data generated by four different spawner behaviors applied to multiple discrete habitats, we show that when spawners were distributed proportionally to local carrying capacities, there was small or no bias in estimated recruitment and stock-recruitment parameters. For an ideal free distribution of spawners, larger bias in the estimates of recruitment and stock-recruitment parameters was obtained, whereas a random and a stepwise spawner behavior introduced the largest bias. Using stock-recruitment data corresponding to a "realistic" range of population densities and adding measurement error (20%-60%) to the simulated stock-recruitment data generated larger variation in the estimation bias than what was introduced by the spawner behavior. Thus, for exploited stocks at low population density and where spawning stock size and recruitment cannot be observed perfectly, partial observation of the possible spawner abundance range and measurement error might be of higher concern for management.

Indexed as

behavior biologyfisheries managementhabitat selectionpopulation ecologypopulation productivitystock‐recruitment

Identifiers

PMID36590336
PMCPMC9797469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.