SynthesisFrontiers in neuroscience2022
A network meta-analysis on the improvement of cognition in patients with vascular dementia by different acupuncture therapies.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of acupuncture on cognitive function and lipid metabolism in post-stroke vascular dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of acupuncture on monoaminergic neurotransmitters in animal models of vascular dementia: a preclinical systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparisons of acupuncture therapies combining conventional treatment in the management of vascular cognitive impairment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- The effect of acupuncture on oxidative stress in animal models of vascular dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological interventions as adjunctive treatment for vascular dementia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Pharmacological treatments for vascular dementia: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Electroacupuncture Ameliorates Cognitive Impairment in Vascular Dementia Rats: Potential Involvement of the Astrocyte-Synapse Axis.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Bioinformatic Identification of Signaling Pathways and Hub Genes in Vascular Dementia.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2024Article
- Advances in Non-Invasive Neuromodulation Techniques for Improving Cognitive Function: A Review.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Advances in understanding the mitochondrial mechanisms underlying acupuncture therapy for post-stroke cognitive impairment.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The second most prevalent cause of dementia is vascular dementia (VaD). Furthermore, acupuncture is a relatively safe and effective traditional therapy for individuals with VaD. We performed a network meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness and safety of various acupuncture therapies for VaD based on existing research. Methods: We searched six electronic databases to screen for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different acupuncture treatments in VaD patients. The Cochrne tool (Review Manager 5.3) was used to evaluate the risk of bias of the included RCTs. Based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework, we assessed the confidence in the evidence using the Confidence In the results from Network Meta-Analysis approach. We used the frequency approach to perform the network meta-analysis. Data were analyzed using R 4.1.1. Results: In total, we included 46 eligible studies. The results of the network analysis showed that the combined interventions of moxibustion (MB) with body acupuncture (BA) (MB + BA) and electroacupuncture (EA) with scalp acupuncture (SA) with BA (EA + SA + BA) were more effective in improving cognitive functions and activities of daily living compared with SA or BA alone. However, in the subgroup analysis, EA + SA + BA showed better efficacy in short- and mid-term acupuncture compared with other acupuncture therapies. Conclusion: Combined acupuncture therapy may be a safe and effective intervention for individuals with VaD, and MB + BA and EA + SA + BA appear to be the most effective interventions. However, because the analysis of this study was based on low-to-moderate evidence, there remains no strong supporting evidence. Thus, high-quality, large-scale, and long-term studies should be conducted in the future to assess the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in VaD. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022354573.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.