Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36590305›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neuroscience2022

A network meta-analysis on the improvement of cognition in patients with vascular dementia by different acupuncture therapies.

Jiayu Wen, Yu Cao, Surui Chang, Qiaoyi Huang, Zhen Zhang, Wei Wei, Jiuxiu Yao, Hui Pei, Hao Li

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jiayu WenGraduate College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yu CaoDepartment of Geriatrics, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Surui ChangDepartment of Geriatrics, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Qiaoyi HuangGraduate College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Zhen ZhangDepartment of Geriatrics, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Wei WeiWangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jiuxiu YaoDepartment of Geriatrics, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hui PeiDepartment of Geriatrics, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hao LiWangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNXiyuan Hospital · CNWangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences · CNShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The second most prevalent cause of dementia is vascular dementia (VaD). Furthermore, acupuncture is a relatively safe and effective traditional therapy for individuals with VaD. We performed a network meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness and safety of various acupuncture therapies for VaD based on existing research. Methods: We searched six electronic databases to screen for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different acupuncture treatments in VaD patients. The Cochrne tool (Review Manager 5.3) was used to evaluate the risk of bias of the included RCTs. Based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework, we assessed the confidence in the evidence using the Confidence In the results from Network Meta-Analysis approach. We used the frequency approach to perform the network meta-analysis. Data were analyzed using R 4.1.1. Results: In total, we included 46 eligible studies. The results of the network analysis showed that the combined interventions of moxibustion (MB) with body acupuncture (BA) (MB + BA) and electroacupuncture (EA) with scalp acupuncture (SA) with BA (EA + SA + BA) were more effective in improving cognitive functions and activities of daily living compared with SA or BA alone. However, in the subgroup analysis, EA + SA + BA showed better efficacy in short- and mid-term acupuncture compared with other acupuncture therapies. Conclusion: Combined acupuncture therapy may be a safe and effective intervention for individuals with VaD, and MB + BA and EA + SA + BA appear to be the most effective interventions. However, because the analysis of this study was based on low-to-moderate evidence, there remains no strong supporting evidence. Thus, high-quality, large-scale, and long-term studies should be conducted in the future to assess the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in VaD. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022354573.

Indexed as

ability of daily lifebody acupuncturecognitive functionelectroacupuncturefrequentist network meta-analysismoxibustionscalp acupuncturevascular dementia

Identifiers

PMID36590305
PMCPMC9797048
OpenAlexW4311365113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.