Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36590253›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroimaging2022

Changes in Primary Somatosensory Cortex Following Allogeneic Hand Transplantation or Autogenic Hand Replantation.

B A Philip, K F Valyear, C M Cirstea, N A Baune, C Kaufman, S H Frey

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroimaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Brain activation for actual and imagined hand movement following bilateral hand transplantation.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025
    Article
  3. Sensing the Self: The Role of the Insula and Interoception in Body Image.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Cortical Reorganization after Limb Loss: Bridging the Gap between Basic Science and Clinical Recovery.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

B A PhilipUniversity of Missouri, Department of Psychological Sciences, Columbia, MO, USA.
K F ValyearUniversity of Missouri, Department of Psychological Sciences, Columbia, MO, USA.
C M CirsteaUniversity of Missouri, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Columbia, MO, USA.
N A BauneUniversity of Missouri, Department of Psychological Sciences, Columbia, MO, USA.
C KaufmanUniversity of Louisville School of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Louisville, KY, USA.
S H FreyUniversity of Missouri, Department of Psychological Sciences, Columbia, MO, USA.
University of Missouri · USBangor University · GBUniversity of Louisville · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Is Cortical Reorganization Following Limb Amputation Functionally Relevant and Reversible?R01NS083377 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FREY, SCOTT H · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS083377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Former amputees who undergo allogeneic hand transplantation or autogenic hand replantation (jointly, "hand restoration") present a unique opportunity to measure the range of post-deafferentation plastic changes in the nervous system, especially primary somatosensory cortex (S1). However, few such patients exist, and previous studies compared single cases to small groups of typical adults. Here, we studied 5 individuals (n = 8 sessions: a transplant with 2 sessions, a transplant with 3 sessions, and three replants with 1 session each). We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure S1 responsiveness to controlled pneumatic tactile stimulation delivered to each patient's left and right fingertips and lower face. These data were compared with responses acquired from typical adults (n = 29) and current unilateral amputees (n = 19). During stimulation of the affected hand, patients' affected S1 (contralateral to affected hand) responded to stimulation in a manner similar both to amputees and to typical adults. The presence of contralateral responses indicated grossly typical S1 function, but responses were universally at the low end of the range of typical variability. Patients' affected S1 showed substantial individual variability in responses to stimulation of the intact hand: while all patients fell within the range of typical adults, some patient sessions (4/8) had substantial ipsilateral responses similar to those exhibited by current amputees. Unlike hand restoration patients, current amputees exhibited substantial S1 reorganization compared to typical adults, including bilateral S1 responses to stimulation of the intact hand. In all three participant groups, we assessed tactile localization by measuring individuals' ability to identify the location of touch on the palm and fingers. Curiously, while transplant patients improved their tactile sensory localization over time, this was uncorrelated with changes in S1 responses to tactile stimuli. Overall, our results provide the first description of cortical responses to well-controlled tactile stimulation after hand restoration. Our case studies indicate that hand restoration patients show S1 function within the range of both typical adults and amputees, but with low-amplitude and individual-specific responses that indicate a wide range of potential cortical neurological changes following de-afferentation and re-afferentation.

Indexed as

amputationcortical reorganizationdeafferentationhand replantationhand transplantationreplantationsomatosensory cortextactile sensation

Identifiers

PMID36590253
PMCPMC9802660
OpenAlexW4302303813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.