Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36590252›Full record

ArticleEarth's future2022

A High-End Estimate of Sea Level Rise for Practitioners.

R S W van de Wal, R J Nicholls, D Behar, K McInnes, D Stammer, J A Lowe, J A Church, R DeConto, X Fettweis, H Goelzer and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Earth's future, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Fracture-driven weakening amplifies projected ice loss from West Antarctica.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Perspective on Regional Sea-level Change and Coastal Impacts.Cambridge prisms. Coastal futures · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

R S W van de WalInstitute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht Utrecht University TA Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2543-3892
R J NichollsTyndall Centre for Climate Change Research University of East Anglia Norwich UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9715-1109
D BeharSan Francisco Public Utilities Commission San Francisco CA USA.
K McInnesClimate Change Research Centre UNSW Australia Sydney NSW Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1810-7215
D StammerCentrum für Erdsystemforschung und Nachhaltigkeit Universität Hamburg Hamburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5777-5347
J A LoweMet Office Hadley Centre Exeter UK.
J A ChurchClimate Change Research Centre UNSW Australia Sydney NSW Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7037-8194
R DeContoDepartment of Geosciences University of Massachusetts-Amherst Amherst MA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2800-6466
X FettweisDepartment of Geography SPHERES Research Unit University of Liège Liège Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4140-3813
H GoelzerNORCE Norwegian Research Centre Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research Bergen Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5878-9599
M HaasnootDeltares Delft The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9062-4698
I D HaighSchool of Ocean and Earth Science University of Southampton National Oceanography Centre Southampton UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9722-3061
J HinkelAdaptation and Social Learning Global Climate Forum Berlin Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7590-992X
B P HortonEarth Observatory of Singapore Nanyang Technological University Singapore Singapore.
T S JamesNatural Resources Canada Geological Survey of Canada Sidney BC Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7321-047X
A JenkinsDepartment of Geography and Environmental Sciences Northumbria University Newcastle upon Tyne UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9117-0616
G LeCozannetCoastal Risks and Climate Change Unit Risks and Prevention Division BRGM Orléans France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2421-3003
A LevermannPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research Potsdam Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4432-4704
W H LipscombClimate and Global Dynamics Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder CO USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7100-3730
B MarzeionInstitute of Geography and MARUM - Center for Marine Environmental Sciences University of Bremen Bremen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6185-3539
F PattynLaboratoire de Glaciologie Université libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4805-5636
A J PayneSchool of Geographical Sciences University of Bristol Bristol UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8825-8425
W T PfefferINSTAAR and Department of Civil, Environmental, Architectural Engineering University of Colorado Boulder CO USA.
S F PriceTheoretical Division Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos NM USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6878-2553
H SeroussiThayer School of Engineering Dartmouth College Hanover NH USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9201-1644
S SunCoastal Risks and Climate Change Unit Risks and Prevention Division BRGM Orléans France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1614-2658
W VeatchUS Army Corps of Engineers, Headquarters Washington DC USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4500-2945
K WhiteUS Department of Defense Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Environment and Energy Resilience) DC Washington USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sea level rise (SLR) is a long-lasting consequence of climate change because global anthropogenic warming takes centuries to millennia to equilibrate for the deep ocean and ice sheets. SLR projections based on climate models support policy analysis, risk assessment and adaptation planning today, despite their large uncertainties. The central range of the SLR distribution is estimated by process-based models. However, risk-averse practitioners often require information about plausible future conditions that lie in the tails of the SLR distribution, which are poorly defined by existing models. Here, a community effort combining scientists and practitioners builds on a framework of discussing physical evidence to quantify high-end global SLR for practitioners. The approach is complementary to the IPCC AR6 report and provides further physically plausible high-end scenarios. High-end estimates for the different SLR components are developed for two climate scenarios at two timescales. For global warming of +2°C in 2100 (RCP2.6/SSP1-2.6) relative to pre-industrial values our high-end global SLR estimates are up to 0.9 m in 2100 and 2.5 m in 2300. Similarly, for a (RCP8.5/SSP5-8.5), we estimate up to 1.6 m in 2100 and up to 10.4 m in 2300. The large and growing differences between the scenarios beyond 2100 emphasize the long-term benefits of mitigation. However, even a modest 2°C warming may cause multi-meter SLR on centennial time scales with profound consequences for coastal areas. Earlier high-end assessments focused on instability mechanisms in Antarctica, while here we emphasize the importance of the timing of ice shelf collapse around Antarctica. This is highly uncertain due to low understanding of the driving processes. Hence both process understanding and emission scenario control high-end SLR.

Indexed as

high‐end sea level rise

Identifiers

PMID36590252
PMCPMC9787942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.