ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Treatment Outcomes according to the EndoPredict Score in ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer.
Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Indirect Treatment Comparison between Ribociclib Combined with Non-Steroidal Aromatase Inhibitors and Ovarian Function Suppression vs. Tamoxifen in Premenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcomes of estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2-) breast cancer according to the risk group using EndoPredict (EP) score. Patients and Methods: Between 2015 and 2019, 207 patients with ER+/HER2- pN0-N1 early breast cancer who underwent surgery, EP test, and adjuvant radiotherapy were accrued. The EPclin score, which combines the molecular EP score with nodal status and tumor size, was calculated, and patients were divided into EPclin low- or high-risk groups by the cutoff value of 3.3. Results: There were 154 and 53 patients in the EPclin low- and high-risk groups, respectively. Forty-one patients (81.1%) of the high-risk group received adjuvant chemotherapy, while only 1 (0.6%) of the low-risk group did. With a median follow-up of 54.1 months (range 8.2-76.6), the 5-year disease-free survival rates of low- and high-risk groups were 100% and 88.9%, respectively ( Conclusions: The EPclin score was associated with recurrences in ER+/HER2- early breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.