Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36590144›Full record

ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Prepubertal Idiopathic Unilateral Gynecomastia: Case Report and Literature Review.

Saskia-Laureen Herbert, Katrin Ergezinger, Stephanie Sauer, Florian Kurz, Tanja Schlaiß, Achim Wöckel, Ute-Susann Albert

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Saskia-Laureen HerbertDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Katrin ErgezingerDepartment of Pediatrics, University Medical Centre Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Stephanie SauerDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Centre Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Florian KurzDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Centre Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Tanja SchlaißDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Achim WöckelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Ute-Susann AlbertDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Gynecomastia is a benign proliferation of the glandular tissue of the breast in males. Depending on the age, it can be considered a physiological condition. Prepubertal unilateral gynecomastia is a rare phenomenon. There are only a few case reports described through the last few years. Case Presentation: We report the clinical appearance and management of prepubertal idiopathic unilateral gynecomastia in a 9-year-old boy. We further include a literature review of 14 cases from 2011 to 2021. In contrast to pubertal gynecomastia, prepubertal gynecomastia and especially unilateral prepubertal gynecomastia are extremely rare conditions. Most cases remain idiopathic. Conclusion: Chromosomal and genetic testing, as well as oncological, endocrine diagnostic and tests for liver and kidney function should be performed. In case of idiopathic prepubertal gynecomastia, surgery is an important part of therapy since patients suffer from their atypical and rare phenotype.

Indexed as

SurgeryUnilateral gynecomastia

Identifiers

PMID36590144
PMCPMC9801404
OpenAlexW4280556534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.