Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36590141›Full record

ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Evaluating HEmopatch® in Reducing Seroma-Related Complications following Axillary Lymph Node DIssection: A Pilot Study (HEIDI).

Merel A Spiekerman van Weezelenburg, Lisa de Rooij, Loeki Aldenhoven, Pieter P H L Broos, Sander M J van Kuijk, Elisabeth R M van Haaren, Alfred Janssen, Yvonne L J Vissers, Geerard L Beets, James van Bastelaar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Merel A Spiekerman van WeezelenburgDepartment of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Lisa de RooijDepartment of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Loeki AldenhovenDepartment of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Pieter P H L BroosDepartment of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Sander M J van KuijkDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Elisabeth R M van HaarenDepartment of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Alfred JanssenDepartment of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Yvonne L J VissersDepartment of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Geerard L BeetsDepartment of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
James van BastelaarDepartment of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Zuyderland Medisch Centrum · NLMaastricht University · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is performed to treat locoregional metastatic disease in breast cancer and melanoma patients. However, it is notorious for its complications, most commonly seroma formation and its sequelae. Ample research has been done to evaluate seroma formation after ALND; these results, however, have not been conclusive. Hence, this pilot study aimed to evaluate a readily available haemostatic patch, Hemopatch®, to assess its effect on seroma formation following ALND. Methods: In this pilot study, a prospective cohort of 20 patients receiving Hemopatch® following ALND was compared to a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent ALND between 2014 and 2019. The primary outcome measure was the number of patients developing clinically significant seroma (CSS) after ALND. Additionally, the number of wound complications, subsequent interventions, additional outpatient clinic visits, and drain output was assessed. Differences between groups were deemed clinically relevant if the proportions differed >50% between groups. Results: In total, 20 prospective and 42 retrospective patients were included. In the Hemopatch® group, 30% of the patients developed CSS, compared to 43% in the control group. Three patients in both groups developed a surgical site infection. Thirty-five percent of patients in the Hemopatch® group required additional unscheduled visits versus 62% of patients in the control group. Conclusion: The application of Hemopatch® after ALND did not lead to a clinically relevant reduction of CSS and wound complications. However, fewer Hemopatch® patients required additional outpatient clinic visits. Due to the limited amount of participants, the true value of Hemopatch® in ALND remains unclear.

Indexed as

Breast cancerLymph node dissectionMelanomaSeroma

Identifiers

PMID36590141
PMCPMC9801401
OpenAlexW4283814643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.