Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36590128›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2022

Comparative study of electrocardiographic parameters in calves born after eutocia versus dystocia.

Julia Nowak, Jessica Joerling, Marlene Sickinger, Axel Wehrend

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia NowakClinic for Veterinary Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Andrology for Large and Small Animals with Ambulance Service, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, Frankfurter Straße 106, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Jessica JoerlingClinic for Ruminants, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, Frankfurter Straße 104, 35392 Gießen, Germany.
Marlene SickingerClinic for Ruminants, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, Frankfurter Straße 104, 35392 Gießen, Germany.
Axel WehrendClinic for Veterinary Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Andrology for Large and Small Animals with Ambulance Service, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, Frankfurter Straße 106, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: The mortality rate of perinatal calves is high, particularly in dystocia cases. Besides detectable conditions such as trauma or amniotic fluid aspiration, the potential salience of cardiological diseases in neonatal bovine deaths has received little attention. This study aimed to compare the electrocardiographic parameters of calves born under conditions of dystocia and eutocia. Materials and Methods: Electrocardiographic, clinical, and laboratory diagnostic examinations were performed during the first 5 days of life on 40 calves. Of them, 20 calves were born under conditions of dystocia and 20 of eutocia. Results: Electrocardiograms (ECGs) did not show detectable arrhythmias in all calves. Both groups exhibited tachycardia on their first ECGs. The QT and ST interval durations developed differently over time in both groups, suggesting that these may be related to conditions of birth. Conclusion: The electrocardiographic differences between calves born of dystocia and eutocia could be a factor in the increased mortality rate of calves born of dystocia.

Indexed as

birthbovineelectrocardiogramneonate

Identifiers

PMID36590128
PMCPMC9798071
OpenAlexW4309376687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.