ArticleVeterinary world2022
Investigation of methicillin-resistant
Article in Veterinary world, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- TheJournal of clinical microbiology · 2025Review
- Genomic and phenotypic characterization of staphylococci isolated from the skin of non-human primates.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2025Article
- First Report of Microplastics in Wild Long-Tailed Macaque (Veterinary sciences · 2024Article
- Characterisation of PVL-PositiveAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Molecular Characterization ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of raw bacteriocin produced from lactic acid bacteria on biofilm of methicillin-resistantVeterinary world · 2023Article
- Identification of Vancomycin Resistance in Methicillin-resistantFrontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Aim: In the past, the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Materials and Methods: Aseptic buccal swab samples were collected from 30 free-ranging macaques in November 2018. All isolates were tested using multiple biochemical tests and Results: Fifteen macaques (50%) were colonized with Conclusion: This study is the first to identify MRSA/MSSA and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.