Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36590071›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2021

A state-of-the-science review of polychlorinated biphenyl exposures at background levels: relative contributions of exposure routes.

Chelsea A Weitekamp, Linda J Phillips, Laura M Carlson, Nicole M DeLuca, Elaine A Cohen Hubal, Geniece M Lehmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Whole-Body Disposition and Metabolism of [Environmental science & technology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chelsea A WeitekampOffice of Research and Development, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Linda J PhillipsOffice of Research and Development, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC, USA; Retired.
Laura M CarlsonOffice of Research and Development, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Nicole M DeLucaOffice of Research and Development, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Elaine A Cohen HubalOffice of Research and Development, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Geniece M LehmannOffice of Research and Development, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) can occur through multiple routes and sources, including dietary intake, inhalation, dermal contact, and ingestion of dust and soils. Dietary exposure to PCBs is often considered the primary exposure route for the general population; however, recent studies suggest an increasing contribution from indoor inhalation exposure. Here, we aim to estimate the relative contribution of different PCB exposure pathways for the general population, as well as for select age groups. We conducted a targeted literature review of PCB concentrations in environmental media, including indoor and outdoor air, indoor dust, and soils, as well as of total dietary intake. Using the average concentrations from the studies identified, we estimated PCB exposure through different routes for the general population. In addition, we assessed exposure via environmental media for select age groups. We identified a total of 70 studies, 64 that provided background PCB concentrations for one or more of the environmental media of interest and 6 studies that provided estimates of dietary intake. Using estimates from studies conducted worldwide, for the general population, dietary intake of PCBs was the major exposure pathway. In general, our review identifies important limitations in the data available to assess population exposures, highlighting the need for more current and population-based estimates of PCB exposure, particularly for indoor air and dietary intake.

Indexed as

dietary exposureingestioninhalationPCBspersistent organic pollutants

Identifiers

PMID36590071
PMCPMC9802026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.