Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36590019›Full record

ArticleItalian journal of food safety2022

Prevalence of

Ayman H Al-Afifi, Dhary Alewy Almashhadany, Aziz S H Al-Azazi, Ahmed M Khalaf, Mohammed Naji Ahmed Odhah, Naif A Al-Gabri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Italian journal of food safety, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Exploring bovine brucellosis in Bangladesh: Current scenario and future outlook.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Detection ofIranian journal of veterinary research · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Ayman H Al-AfifiDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Thamar University, Dhamar, Yemen.
Dhary Alewy AlmashhadanyDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Thamar University, Dhamar, Yemen.
Aziz S H Al-AzaziDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Thamar University, Dhamar, Yemen.
Ahmed M KhalafDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Thamar University, Dhamar, Yemen.
Mohammed Naji Ahmed OdhahDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Thamar University, Dhamar, Yemen.
Naif A Al-GabriDepartment of Veterinary Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Thamar University, Dhamar, Yemen.
Thamar University · YE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brucella infection in animals is considered a great problem in most countries of the world. Our study designed to determine the prevalence of brucella in field animal's milk in Dhamar governorate, Yemen. Total of 808 raw milk samples from non-aborted field animals, 120 milk samples from aborted animals, and 30 pasteurized milk samples were teste by Milk-Ring Test (MRT), milk-ELISA test, isolation and identification of brucella species, and antibiotic susceptibility. The prevalence of brucella in milk samples from field animals was 0.8%, 2.6%, and 2% in cows, sheep, and goat milk samples respectively with MRT, and 0.8%, 1.3% and 1.6% in cows, sheep and goat milk samples respectively with the milk- ELISA test. The prevalence rate in milk samples from aborted animals was 33%, 64% and 41.2% with the MRT and 39%, 49%, and 41.2% in cows, sheep and goats respectively with the milk-ELISA test. All pasteurized milk samples were negative for the milk-ELISA test. The result of isolation showed 0.1% of Brucella in milk samples from field animals while 9.2% from aborted animals. All isolates of Brucella species were sensitivities to rifampicin, doxycycline, kanamycin, gentamicin, streptomycin, tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin, while resistant to ampicillin, erythromycin, and novobiocin. In conclusion, the high prevalence of milk brucella especially in aborted animals needs focusing and build controlling strategies plans to decrease the losses to the economy and avoid transferred to humans with unpasteurized milk consumption.

Indexed as

AntibioticBrucellaField AnimalsMilk-ELISA TestMilk-Ring Test (MRT)Raw Milk

Identifiers

PMID36590019
PMCPMC9795821
OpenAlexW4311545435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.