ReviewFrontiers in public health2022
Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs): A few ethical considerations.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Recommendations to promote equity, diversity and inclusion in decentralized clinical trials.Nature medicine · 2024Guideline
- Trial
- Phase 2a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of londamocitinib (AZD4604) two times per day for 12 weeks in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma uncontrolled on medium-high-dose ICS-LABA.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Trial
- Impact of Adherence to Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia Effectiveness.Yonsei medical journal · 2025Trial
- Validating the Efficacy of a Mobile Digital Therapeutic for Insomnia (WELT-I): Randomized Controlled Decentralized Clinical Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Trial
- Current Landscape of Investigator-Initiated Decentralized Clinical Trials in Japan: A Nationwide Survey.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Article
- The Future is Local: the Role of Decentralised Clinical Trials in Patients with Advanced Cancer Receiving Palliative Care.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
- Article
- Inequities in enrollment across clinical trial phases and the need for a Spanish perspective.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Ethical Challenges and Considerations in Decentralized Clinical Trials (DCTs): Insights from a Scoping Review.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Article
- Article
- Toward Effective Technology Support in DCTs: Insights from the Trials@Home Proof-of-Concept Trial RADIAL.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Decentralized clinical trials in cardiovascular disease : A primer for clinical trialists.Nature cardiovascular research · 2026Review
- SWOT analysis of decentralised clinical trials from an ethical, legal, regulatory and operational perspective.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Article
- Trial characteristics, methods and reported challenges of decentralised clinical trials: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Do people prefer to take part in a clinical trial from home or come to site? A discrete choice experiment in type 2 diabetes mellitus.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Opportunities in Development of Patient-Centric and Decentralized Clinical Trials: Insights from Patients and Healthcare Professionals in Respiratory and Rare Diseases.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Article
- Decentralized Clinical Trials: Governance, Ethics and Medico-Legal Issues for the New Paradigm of Research with a Focus on Cardiovascular Field.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Enhancing accessibility and impact of digitally enabled clinical trials: the WeShare engagement and equity toolkit.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) are studies in which the need for patients to physically access hospital-based trial sites is reduced or eliminated. The CoViD-19 pandemic has caused a significant increase in DCT: a survey shows that 76% of pharmaceutical companies, device manufacturers, and Contract Research Organizations adopted decentralized techniques during the early phase of the pandemic. The implementation of DCTs relies on the use of digital tools such as e-consent, apps, wearable devices, Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes (ePRO), telemedicine, as well as on moving trial activities to the patient's home (e.g., drug delivery) or to local healthcare settings (i.e., community-based diagnosis and care facilities). DCTs adapt to patients' routines, allow patients to participate regardless of where they live by removing logistical barriers, offer better access to the study and the investigational product, and permit the inclusion of more diverse and more representative populations. The feasibility and quality of DCTs depends on several requirements including dedicated infrastructures and staff, an adequate regulatory framework, and partnerships between research sites, patients and sponsors. The evaluation of Ethics Committees (ECs) is crucial to the process of innovating and digitalizing clinical trials: adequate assessment tools and a suitable regulatory framework are needed for evaluation by ECs. DCTs also raise issues, many of which are of considerable ethical significance. These include the implications for the relationship between patients and healthcare staff, for the social dimension of the patient, for data integrity (at the source, during transmission, in the analysis phase), for personal data protection, and for the possible risks to health and safety. Despite their considerable growth, DCTs have only received little attention from bioethicists. This paper offers a review on some ethical implications and requirements of DCTs in order to encourage further ethical reflection on this rapidly emerging field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.