Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36589957›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Adopting social health insurance in Nepal: A mixed study.

Damaru Prasad Paneru, Chiranjivi Adhikari, Sujan Poudel, Lal Mani Adhikari, Deepak Neupane, Juli Bajracharya, Kalpana Jnawali, Kamal Prasad Chapain, Nabaraj Paudel, Nirdesh Baidhya and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Damaru Prasad PaneruSchool of Health and Allied Sciences, Pokhara University, Pokhara, Nepal.
Chiranjivi AdhikariSchool of Health and Allied Sciences, Pokhara University, Pokhara, Nepal.
Sujan PoudelDepartment of Public Health, Nobel College, Pokhara University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Lal Mani AdhikariHERD International, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Deepak NeupaneSchool of Business, Pokhara University, Pokhara, Nepal.
Juli BajracharyaSchool of Health and Allied Sciences, Pokhara University, Pokhara, Nepal.
Kalpana JnawaliDepartment of Public Health, LA Grandee College, Pokhara University, Pokhara, Nepal.
Kamal Prasad ChapainFaculty of Medical Sciences, University of Cyberjaya, Cyberjaya, Malaysia.
Nabaraj PaudelProvince Health Logistics Management Center, Gandaki Province, Pokhara, Nepal.
Nirdesh BaidhyaDepartment of Public Health, Shaheed Krishna Sen Ichhuk Bahuprabidhik Institute, Dang, Nepal.
Ashok RawalCARE Nepal, Lalitpur, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The Social Health Insurance Program (SHIP) shares a major portion of social security, and is also key to Universal Health Coverage (UHC) and health equity. The Government of Nepal launched SHIP in the Fiscal Year 2015/16 for the first phase in three districts, on the principle of financial risk protection through prepayment and risk pooling in health care. Furthermore, the adoption of the program depends on the stakeholders' behaviors, mainly, the beneficiaries and the providers. Therefore, we aimed to explore and assess their perception and experiences regarding various factors acting on SHIP enrollment and adherence. Methods: A cross-sectional, facility-based, concurrent mixed-methods study was carried out in seven health facilities in the Kailali, Baglung, and Ilam districts of Nepal. A total of 822 beneficiaries, sampled using probability proportional to size (PPS), attending health care institutions, were interviewed using a structured questionnaire for quantitative data. A total of seven focus group discussions (FGDs) and 12 in-depth interviews (IDIs), taken purposefully, were conducted with beneficiaries and service providers, using guidelines, respectively. Quantitative data were entered into Epi-data and analyzed with SPSS, MS-Excel, and Epitools, an online statistical calculator. Manual thematic analysis with predefined themes was carried out for qualitative data. Percentage, frequency, mean, and median were used to describe the variables, and the Chi-square test and binary logistic regression were used to infer the findings. We then combined the qualitative data from beneficiaries' and providers' perceptions, and experiences to explore different aspects of health insurance programs as well as to justify the quantitative findings. Results and prospects: Of a total of 822 respondents (insured-404, uninsured-418), 370 (45%) were men. Families' median income was USD $65.96 (8.30-290.43). The perception of insurance premiums did not differ between the insured and uninsured groups ( Conclusion: Although enrollment is encouraging, adherence is weak, with a considerable dropout rate and poor renewal. Patient management strategies and insurance education are recommended urgently. Furthermore, some alternate schemes and strategies may be considered.

Indexed as

Insurance, HealthSocial SecurityCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMaleNepaladherencebarrierenablerhealth insuranceNepalpackagepremiumprepayment

Identifiers

PMID36589957
PMCPMC9798538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.