ArticleHeart rhythm O22022
Impact of a dedicated atrial fibrillation clinic on diagnosis-to-ablation time.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of catheter ablation timing according to duration of atrial fibrillation history on arrhythmia recurrences and clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnosis-to-Ablation Time and Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence After Ablation.JAMA network open · 2026Observational
- Multidisciplinary Atrial Fibrillation Clinics: A Model for Comprehensive Management.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Temporal trends of catheter ablation procedures in patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: A nationwide cohort study.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Outcomes following catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) improve as the diagnosis-to-ablation time (DAT) shortens. Use of a protocol-based integrated care model through a dedicated atrial fibrillation clinic (AFC) may serve to standardize treatment pathways and decrease DAT. Objective: To evaluate the DAT and clinical characteristics of patients with AF referred from an AFC vs a conventional electrophysiology clinic (EC). Methods: Retrospective analysis was completed in consecutive patients undergoing index AF ablation at Riverside Methodist Hospital in 2019 with minimum 1 year follow-up. Patients were categorized based off their CA referral source (AFC vs EC) and where the initial visit following index diagnosis of AF occurred (AFC vs EC). Results: A total of 182 patients (mean age 65 years, 64% male) were reviewed. Patients referred from an AFC (21%) had a median DAT of 342 days (interquartile range [IQR], 125-855 days) compared to patients referred from EC (79%) with a median DAT of 813 days (IQR, 241-1444 days; Conclusion: DAT is a modifiable factor that may affect CA outcomes. Significant reductions in DAT were observed in patients evaluated through a dedicated AF clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.