Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36589863›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2023

Exercise volume load in women with breast cancer: Study protocol for the ABRACE randomized clinical trial.

João Saldanha Henkin, Daniela Dornelles Rosa, Alessandra Menezes Morelle, Maira Caleffi, Stephanie Santanna Pinto, Ronei Silveira Pinto

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03314168 (Effects of Different Volumes of Combined Training on Neuromuscular Parameters of Women in Initial Treatment for Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03314168 naunknown statusnot on this map

Effects of Different Volumes of Combined Training on Neuromuscular Parameters of Women in Initial Treatment for Breast Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorJoão HenkinRan2017 to 2025Enrolled84ConditionsBreast CancerArmsCombined training, Control group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

João Saldanha HenkinExercise Research Laboratory, Physical Education, Physiotherapy, and Dance School, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Daniela Dornelles RosaMedical Oncology, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Alessandra Menezes MorelleMedical Oncology, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Maira CaleffiMedical Oncology, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Stephanie Santanna PintoNeuromuscular Assessment Laboratory, Physical Education School, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Ronei Silveira PintoExercise Research Laboratory, Physical Education, Physiotherapy, and Dance School, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: An increased number of breast cancer patients are challenged by acute and persistent treatment side effects. Oncology guidelines have been establishing physical exercise to counteract several treatment-related toxicities throughout cancer care. However, evidence regarding the optimal dose-response, feasibility, and the minimal resistance exercise volume and/or intensity remains unclear. The ABRACE Study will assess the impact of different resistance training volumes (i.e., single or multiple sets) combined with aerobic exercise on physical and psychological outcomes of breast cancer patients undergoing primary treatment. Methods: This study is a randomized, controlled, three-armed parallel trial. A total of 84 participants, aged ≥18 years, with breast cancer stages I-III, initiating adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (≤50% of sessions completed) will be randomized to multiple sets resistance training plus aerobic training group, single set resistance training plus aerobic training group or control group. Neuromuscular and cancer-related fatigue (primary outcomes), muscle strength, muscle thickness, muscle quality by echo intensity, body composition, cardiorespiratory capacity, functional performance, upper-body endurance and quality of life will be measured before and after the 12-week intervention. Our analysis will follow the intention-to-treat approach and per-protocol criteria, with additional sub-group analysis. Discussion: Findings support prescribing exercise during chemotherapy for breast cancer and elucidate the potential role of different resistance training volumes as a management strategy for physical and psychological impairments in women with early-stage breast cancer. Our main hypothesis is for superiority in physical and psychological outcomes for both training groups compared to the control group, with no difference between single or multiple sets groups. Trial registration: Clinical trials NCT03314168.

Indexed as

1-RM, one-repetition maximum3-RM, three-repetition maximumABRACE, Adaptations to Breast Cancer and ExerciseBreast neoplasmsCG, control groupCombined trainingDXA, Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometryEI, echo intensityES, effect sizeFatigueITT, intent-to-treat analysisMQ, muscle qualityMT, muscle thicknessPhysical exercisePP, per-protocol analysisQF, quadricepsQoL, quality of lifeRF, rectus femorisSM + AT, multiple sets resistance training plus aerobic trainingSS + AT, single set resistance training plus aerobic trainingStrength trainingVL, vastus lateralisVM, vastus medialisVT, vastus intermedius

Identifiers

PMID36589863
PMCPMC9798137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.