Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36589837›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Gene mutations associated with fertilization failure after

Yamei Xue, Xiaohong Cheng, Yuping Xiong, Kun Li

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Assisted oocyte activation re-envisioned: a more physiological approach.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Identification of a Novel BiallelicThe world journal of men's health · 2026
    Article
  5. Precise mimicry of physiological CaBioengineering & translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Further evidence fromiScience · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yamei XueAssisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou,  China.
Xiaohong ChengInstitute for Reproductive Health, School of Pharmacy, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou,  China.
Yuping XiongInstitute for Reproductive Health, School of Pharmacy, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou,  China.
Kun LiInstitute for Reproductive Health, School of Pharmacy, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou,  China.
Hangzhou Medical College · CNSir Run Run Shaw Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fertilization failure during assisted reproductive technologies (ART) is often unpredictable, as this failure is encountered only after in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) have been performed. The etiology of fertilization failure remains elusive. More and more mutations of genes are found to be involved in human fertilization failure in infertile patients as high throughput sequencing techniques are becoming widely applied. In this review, the mutations of nine important genes expressed in sperm or oocytes,

Indexed as

FertilizationInfertilitySperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicFertilization in VitroHumansMaleMutationSemenTubulinTUBB8 protein, humanTubulinassisted reproductive technology (ART)fertilizationfertilization failuregene mutationintracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)in vitro fertilization (IVF)oocytesperm

Identifiers

PMID36589837
PMCPMC9800785
OpenAlexW4313272765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.