Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36589771›Full record

ArticleSN computer science2023

Cough Audio Analysis for COVID-19 Diagnosis.

Teghdeep Kapoor, Tanya Pandhi, Bharat Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SN computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Teghdeep Kapoor *Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, Sector-62, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201309 India.ORCID 0000-0002-9125-8482
Tanya Pandhi *Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, Sector-62, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201309 India.
Bharat GuptaFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, Sector-62, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201309 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humanity has suffered catastrophically due to the COVID-19 pandemic. One of the most reliable diagnoses of COVID-19 is RT-PCR (reverse-transcription polymer chain reaction) testing. This method, however, has its limitations. It is time consuming and requires scalability. This research work carries out a preliminary prognosis of COVID-19, which is scalable and less time consuming. The research carried out a competitive analysis of four machine-learning models namely, Multilayer Perceptron, Convolutional Neural Networks, Recurrent Neural Networks with Long Short-Term Memory, and VGG-19 with Support Vector Machines. Out of these models, Multilayer Perceptron outperformed with higher specificity of 94.5% and accuracy of 96.8%. The results show that Multilayer Perceptron was able to distinguish between positive and negative COVID-19 coughs by a robust feature embedding technique.

Indexed as

CNNCough diagnosisCOVID-19COVID-19 preliminary diagnosisDeep learningLSTMMachine learningMLPRNNSVM

Identifiers

PMID36589771
PMCPMC9791965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.