ArticleLiver cancer2022
Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab versus Sorafenib for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results from Older Adults Enrolled in the IMbrave150 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in Liver cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of FLT3 inhibitors in monotherapy of hematological and solid malignancies: a systemic analysis of clinical trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Atezolizumab-bevacizumab in very elderly with hepatocellular carcinoma: Age alone is not a limiting factor except in ALBI grade 3.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026Observational
- Article
- Adaptive dosing of immunotherapy plus anti-angiogenic therapy in a nonagenarian with hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report with 10-year survival.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Aging modulation of the immune system and immunotherapy efficacy in cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Article
- Review
- Effect of Immunotherapy on Late Elderly Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Clinical Study.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Safety and efficacy of TACE combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus molecular targeted therapies in older adults with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Bevacizumab Combined with Atezolizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab versus Sorafenib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Main Trunk and/or Contralateral Portal Vein Invasion in IMbrave150.Liver cancer · 2024Article
- Inclusion, characteristics, and reporting of older adults in FDA registration studies of immunotherapy, 2018-2022.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2024Review
- Analysis of Immune-Related Adverse Events of Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicentre Cohort Study.Liver cancer · 2024Article
- ALK inhibitors suppress HCC and synergize with anti-PD-1 therapy and ABT-263 in preclinical models.iScience · 2024Article
- Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Outcomes of Patients With Locally Advanced/Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated at the Veterans Health Administration.The oncologist · 2024Article
- Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in current systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Review
- Tumor Vasculature as an Emerging Pharmacological Target to Promote Anti-Tumor Immunity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- FNBP4 is a Potential Biomarker Associated with Cuproptosis and Promotes Tumor Progression in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
- Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab Combination as a First Line Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2023Review
- Impact of older age in patients receiving atezolizumab and bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The efficacy of systemic first-line treatments in older adults with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been well-studied. We compared the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib as a first-line treatment in younger versus older patients with unresectable HCC. Methods: This global, phase 3, open-label, randomized clinical trial (IMbrave150) recruited patients aged ≥18 years with locally advanced metastatic or unresectable HCC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1, and Child-Pugh class A liver function who had not previously received systemic therapy for liver cancer. Patients received either 1,200 mg atezolizumab plus 15 mg/kg bevacizumab intravenously every 3 weeks or 400 mg sorafenib orally twice daily until loss of clinical benefit or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were the incidence of adverse events and time to deterioration of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). This subgroup analysis evaluated safety and efficacy endpoints in patients <65 years, ≥65 to <75 years, and ≥75 years. Results: Of 501 patients, 165 patients were randomized to sorafenib and 336 were randomized to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (175 patients <65 years; 106 patients ≥65 to <75 years; 55 patients ≥75 years). Across all age groups, patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab had longer median OS (<65: 18.0 vs. 12.2 months [HR, 0.57; 95% CI: 0.40-0.82]; ≥65 to <75: 19.4 vs. 14.9 months [HR, 0.80; 95% CI: 0.52-1.23]; ≥75: 24.0 vs. 18.0 months [HR, 0.72, 95% CI: 0.37-1.41]) and PFS than those receiving sorafenib. Time to deterioration for multiple PROs was delayed for patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, including older adults. There were no clinically meaningful differences in toxicity between age groups. Conclusion: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is safe and effective in adults <65, ≥65 to <75, and ≥75. Treatment was well-tolerated even in elderly patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.