Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36589594›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2022

Self-supervised speckle noise reduction of optical coherence tomography without clean data.

Yangxi Li, Yingwei Fan, Hongen Liao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yangxi LiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1401-4054
Yingwei FanInstitute of Engineering Medicine, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4535-3451
Hongen LiaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3847-9347

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is widely used in clinical diagnosis due to its non-invasive, real-time, and high-resolution characteristics. However, the inherent speckle noise seriously degrades the image quality, which might damage the fine structures in OCT, thus affecting the diagnosis results. In recent years, supervised deep learning-based denoising methods have shown excellent denoising ability. To train a deep denoiser, a large number of paired noisy-clean images are required, which is difficult to achieve in clinical practice, since acquiring a speckle-free OCT image requires dozens of repeated scans and image registration. In this research, we propose a self-supervised strategy that helps build a despeckling model by training it to map neighboring pixels in a single noisy OCT image. Adjacent pixel patches are randomly selected from the original OCT image to generate two similar undersampled images, which are respectively used as the input and target images for training a deep neural network. To ensure both the despeckling and the structure-preserving effects, a multi-scale pixel patch sampler and corresponding loss functions are adopted in our practice. Through quantitative evaluation and qualitative visual comparison, we found that the proposed method performs better than state-of-the-art methods regarding despeckling effects and structure preservation. Besides, the proposed method is much easier to train and deploy without the need for clean OCT images, which has great significance in clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID36589594
PMCPMC9774848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.