Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36589577›Full record

ReviewBiomedical optics express2022

Adaptive optics visual simulators: a review of recent optical designs and applications [Invited].

Susana Marcos, Pablo Artal, David A Atchison, Karen Hampson, Richard Legras, Linda Lundström, Geunyoung Yoon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical optics express, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Halo Measurements in Simulated Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.Translational vision science & technology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Head-mounted adaptive optics visual simulator.Biomedical optics express · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Monovision Correction Preference and Eye Dominance Measurements.Translational vision science & technology · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Susana MarcosCenter for Visual Sciences; The Institute of Optics and Flaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester, New York 14642, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5511-1697
Pablo ArtalLaboratorio de Optica, Universidad de Murcia, Campus Universitario de Espinardo, 30100, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1284-6591
David A AtchisonCentre for Vision and Eye Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane Q, 4059, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3099-6545
Karen HampsonDepartment of Optometry, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Richard LegrasLuMIn, CNRS, ENS Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupelec, Université Paris-Saclay Orsay, 91400, France.
Linda LundströmKTH (Royal Institute of Technology), Stockholm, 10691, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4894-7944
Geunyoung YoonCollege of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, 77004, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4171-8927

Funding

VISUAL SCIENCE RESEARCH CTR SUPPORTP30EY001319 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Susana Marcos · 1985 to 2026
$17.5M
Research Programming ModuleP30EY007551 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI LAURA J. FRISHMAN · 1988 to 2026
$16.4M
Mechanisms and plasticity of long term visual adaptation to ocular opticsR01EY014999 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI GEUNYOUNG YOON · 2003 to 2026
$5.9M
Peripheral optical and neural contributions to myopia developmentR01EY034151 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI GEUNYOUNG YOON · 2022 to 2026
$2.1M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001319NEI NIH HHS P30 EY007551NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014999NEI NIH HHS R01 EY034151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In their pioneering work demonstrating measurement and full correction of the eye's optical aberrations, Liang, Williams and Miller, [JOSA A14, 2884 (1997)10.1364/JOSAA.14.002884] showed improvement in visual performance using adaptive optics (AO). Since then, AO visual simulators have been developed to explore the spatial limits to human vision and as platforms to test non-invasively optical corrections for presbyopia, myopia, or corneal irregularities. These applications have allowed new psychophysics bypassing the optics of the eye, ranging from studying the impact of the interactions of monochromatic and chromatic aberrations on vision to neural adaptation. Other applications address new paradigms of lens designs and corrections of ocular errors. The current paper describes a series of AO visual simulators developed in laboratories around the world, key applications, and current trends and challenges. As the field moves into its second quarter century, new available technologies and a solid reception by the clinical community promise a vigorous and expanding use of AO simulation in years to come.

Identifiers

PMID36589577
PMCPMC9774875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.